PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OISGX vs. JATTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

OISGX vs. JATTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Optimum Small-Mid Cap Growth Fund (OISGX) and Janus Henderson Triton Fund Class T (JATTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OISGX achieves a 13.84% return, which is significantly lower than JATTX's 15.41% return. Over the past 10 years, OISGX has outperformed JATTX with an annualized return of 12.56%, while JATTX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.06% annualized return.


OISGX

1D
1.83%
1M
-3.36%
6M
10.56%
YTD
13.84%
1Y
24.82%
3Y*
13.01%
5Y*
4.18%
10Y*
12.56%
ALL TIME*
9.55%

JATTX

1D
1.44%
1M
-1.27%
6M
11.68%
YTD
15.41%
1Y
23.63%
3Y*
13.35%
5Y*
4.50%
10Y*
10.06%
ALL TIME*
11.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

OISGX vs. JATTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
OISGX
Optimum Small-Mid Cap Growth Fund
13.84%9.56%14.23%13.92%-28.00%12.89%57.04%25.72%-3.00%27.59%
JATTX
Janus Henderson Triton Fund Class T
15.41%9.54%10.30%14.52%-23.75%6.63%28.41%28.30%-5.25%26.90%

Correlation

The correlation between OISGX and JATTX is 0.92, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2005

0.95

The correlation between OISGX and JATTX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OISGX vs. JATTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

OISGX
OISGX Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
OISGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OISGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
OISGX Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
OISGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
OISGX Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

JATTX
JATTX Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
JATTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JATTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
JATTX Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
JATTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
JATTX Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

OISGX vs. JATTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Optimum Small-Mid Cap Growth Fund (OISGX) and Janus Henderson Triton Fund Class T (JATTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


OISGXJATTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.26

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.75

2.25

-0.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.33

9.12

-2.78

OISGX vs. JATTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OISGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is comparable to the JATTX Sharpe Ratio of 1.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OISGX and JATTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

OISGX vs. JATTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OISGX drawdown since its inception was -62.75%, which is greater than JATTX's maximum drawdown of -57.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OISGX and JATTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OISGXJATTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.75%

-57.77%

-4.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.52%

-11.09%

-4.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.82%

-23.90%

-5.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.63%

-31.90%

-3.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.22%

-39.71%

+0.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.83%

-2.02%

-3.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.19%

-8.71%

-3.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.28%

2.73%

+1.55%

Volatility

OISGX vs. JATTX - Volatility Comparison

Optimum Small-Mid Cap Growth Fund (OISGX) has a higher volatility of 5.92% compared to Janus Henderson Triton Fund Class T (JATTX) at 3.63%. This indicates that OISGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JATTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OISGXJATTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.92%

3.63%

+2.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.07%

13.33%

+3.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.70%

16.76%

+4.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.34%

19.72%

+3.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.46%

20.56%

+2.90%

OISGX vs. JATTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

OISGX has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is higher than JATTX's 0.91% expense ratio.


Dividends

OISGX vs. JATTX - Dividend Comparison

OISGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.33%, less than JATTX's 9.99% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JATTX
Janus Henderson Triton Fund Class T
9.99%11.54%7.74%7.29%6.35%20.71%4.17%4.30%7.56%5.11%2.83%7.89%
OISGX
Optimum Small-Mid Cap Growth Fund
2.33%2.65%0.00%0.00%8.92%32.79%15.04%9.33%24.93%4.21%0.00%15.87%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, OISGX and JATTX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

OISGX has higher volatility (5.92%) compared to JATTX (3.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OISGX dropped -62.75% vs JATTX's -57.77%.

JATTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.49 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OISGX and JATTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer