PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OISGX vs. OILGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

OISGX vs. OILGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Optimum Small-Mid Cap Growth Fund (OISGX) and Optimum Large Cap Growth Fund (OILGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OISGX achieves a 14.90% return, which is significantly higher than OILGX's 10.05% return. Over the past 10 years, OISGX has underperformed OILGX with an annualized return of 13.41%, while OILGX has yielded a comparatively higher 17.39% annualized return.


OISGX

1D
0.81%
1M
8.13%
YTD
14.90%
6M
14.45%
1Y
33.99%
3Y*
14.97%
5Y*
4.66%
10Y*
13.41%

OILGX

1D
-0.29%
1M
7.16%
YTD
10.05%
6M
9.10%
1Y
27.94%
3Y*
29.54%
5Y*
14.72%
10Y*
17.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OISGX vs. OILGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
OISGX
Optimum Small-Mid Cap Growth Fund
14.90%9.56%14.23%13.92%-28.00%12.89%57.04%25.72%-3.00%27.59%
OILGX
Optimum Large Cap Growth Fund
10.05%15.97%49.90%41.16%-34.69%17.88%33.81%31.34%-0.80%32.46%

Correlation

The correlation between OISGX and OILGX is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2003

0.87

The correlation between OISGX and OILGX shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (1 year) to 0.87 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OISGX vs. OILGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OISGX
OISGX Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
OISGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OISGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
OISGX Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
OISGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
OISGX Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

OILGX
OILGX Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
OILGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OILGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
OILGX Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
OILGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
OILGX Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OISGX vs. OILGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Optimum Small-Mid Cap Growth Fund (OISGX) and Optimum Large Cap Growth Fund (OILGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


OISGXOILGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.31

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.34

1.88

+0.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.13

6.64

+2.49

OISGX vs. OILGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OISGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.78, which is comparable to the OILGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OISGX and OILGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


OISGXOILGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.78

1.80

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

0.63

-0.43

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

0.79

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

0.59

-0.17

Drawdowns

OISGX vs. OILGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OISGX drawdown since its inception was -62.75%, which is greater than OILGX's maximum drawdown of -54.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OISGX and OILGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OISGXOILGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.75%

-54.28%

-8.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.52%

-15.31%

-0.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.82%

-23.75%

-6.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.63%

-39.97%

+4.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.22%

-39.97%

+0.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.29%

+0.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.26%

-8.48%

-3.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.97%

4.33%

-0.36%

Volatility

OISGX vs. OILGX - Volatility Comparison

Optimum Small-Mid Cap Growth Fund (OISGX) has a higher volatility of 6.15% compared to Optimum Large Cap Growth Fund (OILGX) at 3.64%. This indicates that OISGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OILGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OISGXOILGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.15%

3.64%

+2.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.61%

12.02%

+3.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.36%

16.03%

+4.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.14%

23.40%

-0.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.42%

22.04%

+1.38%

OISGX vs. OILGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

OISGX has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is higher than OILGX's 0.89% expense ratio.


Dividends

OISGX vs. OILGX - Dividend Comparison

OISGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.31%, less than OILGX's 12.77% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
OILGX
Optimum Large Cap Growth Fund
12.77%14.05%20.62%11.50%4.95%14.42%7.72%2.98%14.76%18.13%3.68%10.49%
OISGX
Optimum Small-Mid Cap Growth Fund
2.31%2.65%0.00%0.00%8.92%32.79%15.04%9.33%24.93%4.21%0.00%15.87%

Frequently Asked Questions


OISGX and OILGX have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

OISGX has higher volatility (6.15%) compared to OILGX (3.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OISGX dropped -62.75% vs OILGX's -54.28%.

OILGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.80 vs 1.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OISGX and OILGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer