PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OISGX vs. DMCRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

OISGX vs. DMCRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Optimum Small-Mid Cap Growth Fund (OISGX) and Driehaus Micro Cap Growth Fund (DMCRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OISGX achieves a 13.84% return, which is significantly lower than DMCRX's 21.90% return. Over the past 10 years, OISGX has underperformed DMCRX with an annualized return of 12.56%, while DMCRX has yielded a comparatively higher 20.77% annualized return.


OISGX

1D
1.83%
1M
-3.36%
6M
10.56%
YTD
13.84%
1Y
24.82%
3Y*
13.01%
5Y*
4.18%
10Y*
12.56%
ALL TIME*
9.55%

DMCRX

1D
2.52%
1M
-4.64%
6M
11.66%
YTD
21.90%
1Y
59.44%
3Y*
28.01%
5Y*
10.65%
10Y*
20.77%
ALL TIME*
18.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

OISGX vs. DMCRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
OISGX
Optimum Small-Mid Cap Growth Fund
13.84%9.56%14.23%13.92%-28.00%12.89%57.04%25.72%-3.00%27.59%
DMCRX
Driehaus Micro Cap Growth Fund
21.90%31.17%30.58%11.47%-33.54%22.23%86.43%34.03%2.52%24.35%

Correlation

The correlation between OISGX and DMCRX is 0.86, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.91

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2013

0.91

The correlation between OISGX and DMCRX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OISGX vs. DMCRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

OISGX
OISGX Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
OISGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OISGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
OISGX Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
OISGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
OISGX Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

DMCRX
DMCRX Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
DMCRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DMCRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
DMCRX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
DMCRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
DMCRX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

OISGX vs. DMCRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Optimum Small-Mid Cap Growth Fund (OISGX) and Driehaus Micro Cap Growth Fund (DMCRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


OISGXDMCRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.87

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.79

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.33

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.75

4.20

-2.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.33

13.04

-6.71

OISGX vs. DMCRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OISGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is lower than the DMCRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OISGX and DMCRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

OISGX vs. DMCRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OISGX drawdown since its inception was -62.75%, which is greater than DMCRX's maximum drawdown of -46.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OISGX and DMCRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OISGXDMCRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.75%

-46.68%

-16.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.52%

-15.46%

-0.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.82%

-34.92%

+5.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.63%

-46.68%

+11.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.22%

-46.68%

+7.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.83%

-9.03%

+3.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.19%

-14.71%

+2.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.28%

4.96%

-0.68%

Volatility

OISGX vs. DMCRX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Optimum Small-Mid Cap Growth Fund (OISGX) is 5.92%, while Driehaus Micro Cap Growth Fund (DMCRX) has a volatility of 9.44%. This indicates that OISGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DMCRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OISGXDMCRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.92%

9.44%

-3.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.07%

23.82%

-6.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.70%

30.58%

-8.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.34%

28.82%

-5.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.46%

28.13%

-4.67%

OISGX vs. DMCRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

OISGX has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is lower than DMCRX's 1.38% expense ratio.


Dividends

OISGX vs. DMCRX - Dividend Comparison

OISGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.33%, less than DMCRX's 11.25% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DMCRX
Driehaus Micro Cap Growth Fund
11.25%13.72%3.86%0.87%8.20%48.23%19.79%14.70%33.22%8.91%0.00%4.20%
OISGX
Optimum Small-Mid Cap Growth Fund
2.33%2.65%0.00%0.00%8.92%32.79%15.04%9.33%24.93%4.21%0.00%15.87%

Frequently Asked Questions


OISGX and DMCRX have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DMCRX has higher volatility (9.44%) compared to OISGX (5.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OISGX dropped -62.75% vs DMCRX's -46.68%.

DMCRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OISGX and DMCRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer