OILT vs. RNWZ
OILT (Texas Capital Texas Oil Index ETF) and RNWZ (TrueShares Eagle Global Renewable Energy Income ETF) are both Energy Equities funds. OILT is passively managed, while RNWZ is actively managed. Over the past year, OILT returned 47.26% vs 38.19% for RNWZ. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. OILT charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for RNWZ.
Performance
OILT vs. RNWZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OILT achieves a 35.33% return, which is significantly higher than RNWZ's 16.28% return.
OILT
- 1D
- 1.74%
- 1M
- -4.77%
- YTD
- 35.33%
- 6M
- 29.79%
- 1Y
- 47.26%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RNWZ
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- -2.61%
- YTD
- 16.28%
- 6M
- 16.86%
- 1Y
- 38.19%
- 3Y*
- 12.63%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
OILT vs. RNWZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
OILT Texas Capital Texas Oil Index ETF | 35.33% | -3.30% | 0.87% | -0.16% |
RNWZ TrueShares Eagle Global Renewable Energy Income ETF | 16.28% | 36.33% | -7.36% | 2.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between OILT and RNWZ is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 22, 2023 | 0.11 |
OILT vs. RNWZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
OILT
RNWZ
Energy
Utilities
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
-
Energy
OILT
RNWZ
Utilities
OILT
RNWZ
Basic Materials
OILT
-
RNWZ
Communication Services
OILT
-
RNWZ
-
Consumer Cyclical
OILT
-
RNWZ
-
Consumer Defensive
OILT
-
RNWZ
-
Financial Services
OILT
-
RNWZ
Healthcare
OILT
-
RNWZ
-
Industrials
OILT
-
RNWZ
Real Estate
OILT
-
RNWZ
Technology
OILT
-
RNWZ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OILT vs. RNWZ — Risk / Return Rank
OILT
RNWZ
OILT vs. RNWZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Texas Capital Texas Oil Index ETF (OILT) and TrueShares Eagle Global Renewable Energy Income ETF (RNWZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| OILT | RNWZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.85 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.45 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.44 | 6.33 | -2.89 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.37 | 15.60 | -7.23 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| OILT | RNWZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.70 | 2.55 | -0.85 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 0.61 | -0.19 |
Drawdowns
OILT vs. RNWZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OILT drawdown since its inception was -35.21%, which is greater than RNWZ's maximum drawdown of -24.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OILT and RNWZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OILT | RNWZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.21% | -24.90% | -10.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.79% | -6.06% | -7.73% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -24.74% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.67% | -4.46% | -4.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.93% | -7.19% | -5.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.66% | 2.45% | +3.21% |
Volatility
OILT vs. RNWZ - Volatility Comparison
Texas Capital Texas Oil Index ETF (OILT) has a higher volatility of 9.94% compared to TrueShares Eagle Global Renewable Energy Income ETF (RNWZ) at 5.06%. This indicates that OILT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RNWZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OILT | RNWZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.94% | 5.06% | +4.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.13% | 11.86% | +9.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.09% | 15.06% | +13.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.72% | 16.99% | +11.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.72% | 16.99% | +11.73% |
OILT vs. RNWZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
OILT has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than RNWZ's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
OILT vs. RNWZ - Dividend Comparison
OILT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.43%, more than RNWZ's 1.93% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OILT Texas Capital Texas Oil Index ETF | 2.43% | 3.12% | 2.63% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RNWZ TrueShares Eagle Global Renewable Energy Income ETF | 1.93% | 2.12% | 2.36% | 3.87% | 0.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
OILT and RNWZ have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
OILT has higher volatility (9.94%) compared to RNWZ (5.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OILT dropped -35.21% vs RNWZ's -24.90%.
On 1-year performance, OILT leads with 47.26% vs 38.19% for RNWZ. On fees, OILT is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, RNWZ has been the lower-risk option at 5.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, OILT has performed better with a 47.26% return vs 38.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
OILT is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for RNWZ.
OILT has the higher dividend yield at 2.43%, compared with 1.93% for RNWZ.
They also come from different issuers: Texas Capital and TrueShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for OILT and 0.75% for RNWZ.
RNWZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.55 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for OILT and RNWZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer