OILK vs. SSO
OILK (ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF) and SSO (ProShares Ultra S&P500) are both exchange-traded funds - OILK is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index, while SSO is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the S&P 500. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, OILK returned 17.73%/yr vs 19.62%/yr for SSO. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. OILK charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.87%/yr for SSO.
Performance
OILK vs. SSO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OILK achieves a 64.22% return, which is significantly higher than SSO's 19.37% return.
OILK
- 1D
- 1.40%
- 1M
- -1.65%
- YTD
- 64.22%
- 6M
- 60.70%
- 1Y
- 58.99%
- 3Y*
- 19.03%
- 5Y*
- 17.73%
- 10Y*
- —
SSO
- 1D
- -1.40%
- 1M
- 9.75%
- YTD
- 19.37%
- 6M
- 18.81%
- 1Y
- 52.69%
- 3Y*
- 37.56%
- 5Y*
- 19.62%
- 10Y*
- 24.21%
OILK vs. SSO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OILK ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF | 64.22% | -11.86% | 8.18% | -0.97% | 27.57% | 63.71% | -61.09% | 30.48% | -20.40% | 2.82% |
SSO ProShares Ultra S&P500 | 19.37% | 26.19% | 43.48% | 46.65% | -38.98% | 60.57% | 21.54% | 63.45% | -14.60% | 44.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between OILK and SSO is -0.29, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.29 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.04 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2016 | 0.18 |
The correlation between OILK and SSO shifts across timeframes, from -0.29 (1 year) to 0.18 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
OILK vs. SSO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
OILK
SSO
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Cyclical
OILK
SSO
Basic Materials
OILK
-
SSO
Communication Services
OILK
-
SSO
Consumer Defensive
OILK
-
SSO
Energy
OILK
-
SSO
Financial Services
OILK
-
SSO
Healthcare
OILK
-
SSO
Industrials
OILK
-
SSO
Real Estate
OILK
-
SSO
Technology
OILK
-
SSO
Utilities
OILK
-
SSO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OILK vs. SSO — Risk / Return Rank
OILK
SSO
OILK vs. SSO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK) and ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| OILK | SSO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.06 | 2.25 | -0.18 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.59 | 2.86 | -0.27 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.38 | -0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.42 | 2.91 | +0.50 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.91 | 12.80 | -5.89 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| OILK | SSO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.06 | 2.25 | -0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 | 0.59 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.68 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.12 | 0.42 | -0.30 |
Drawdowns
OILK vs. SSO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OILK drawdown since its inception was -83.76%, roughly equal to the maximum SSO drawdown of -84.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OILK and SSO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OILK | SSO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -83.76% | -84.67% | +0.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.35% | -18.17% | +0.82% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.42% | -35.21% | +11.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.69% | -46.73% | +12.04% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -59.34% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.66% | -1.40% | -2.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.61% | -19.57% | -13.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.56% | 4.13% | +4.43% |
Volatility
OILK vs. SSO - Volatility Comparison
ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK) has a higher volatility of 10.44% compared to ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO) at 5.66%. This indicates that OILK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SSO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OILK | SSO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.44% | 5.66% | +4.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.26% | 17.78% | +5.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.75% | 23.60% | +5.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.12% | 33.65% | -3.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.97% | 35.89% | +0.08% |
OILK vs. SSO - Expense Ratio Comparison
OILK has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than SSO's 0.87% expense ratio.
Dividends
OILK vs. SSO - Dividend Comparison
OILK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.18%, more than SSO's 0.62% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OILK ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF | 8.18% | 4.79% | 3.11% | 5.80% | 17.32% | 68.82% | 0.13% | 0.94% | 0.58% | 6.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SSO ProShares Ultra S&P500 | 0.62% | 0.68% | 0.85% | 0.18% | 0.50% | 0.18% | 0.20% | 0.50% | 0.75% | 0.39% | 0.51% | 0.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
OILK and SSO have a correlation of -0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
OILK has higher volatility (10.44%) compared to SSO (5.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OILK dropped -83.76% vs SSO's -84.67%.
On 5-year performance, SSO leads with 19.62% vs 17.73% for OILK. On fees, OILK is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, SSO has been the lower-risk option at 5.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SSO has performed better with a 19.62% return vs 17.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
OILK is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.87% for SSO.
OILK has the higher dividend yield at 8.18%, compared with 0.62% for SSO.
OILK is categorized as Oil & Gas, while SSO is Leveraged Equities. OILK tracks Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index, while SSO tracks S&P 500. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for OILK and 0.87% for SSO.
SSO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.25 vs 2.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for OILK and SSO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer