OILGX vs. DVMHX
OILGX (Optimum Large Cap Growth Fund) and DVMHX (Delaware Minnesota High-Yield Municipal Bond Fund) are both mutual funds - OILGX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Delaware Funds, while DVMHX is a Municipal Bonds fund managed by Delaware Funds. Over the past 10 years, OILGX returned 16.06%/yr vs 2.24%/yr for DVMHX. Their -0.06 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. OILGX charges 0.89%/yr vs 0.88%/yr for DVMHX.
Performance
OILGX vs. DVMHX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OILGX achieves a 1.65% return, which is significantly higher than DVMHX's 0.97% return. Over the past 10 years, OILGX has outperformed DVMHX with an annualized return of 16.06%, while DVMHX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.24% annualized return.
OILGX
- 1D
- 2.80%
- 1M
- -2.88%
- 6M
- 2.14%
- YTD
- 1.65%
- 1Y
- 12.37%
- 3Y*
- 23.21%
- 5Y*
- 11.18%
- 10Y*
- 16.06%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.70%
DVMHX
- 1D
- -0.50%
- 1M
- -2.47%
- 6M
- 0.24%
- YTD
- 0.97%
- 1Y
- 7.37%
- 3Y*
- 4.33%
- 5Y*
- 0.76%
- 10Y*
- 2.24%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.19%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
OILGX vs. DVMHX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OILGX Optimum Large Cap Growth Fund | 1.65% | 15.97% | 49.90% | 41.16% | -34.69% | 17.88% | 33.81% | 31.34% | -0.80% | 32.46% |
DVMHX Delaware Minnesota High-Yield Municipal Bond Fund | 0.97% | 4.22% | 5.10% | 5.24% | -10.69% | 3.07% | 3.95% | 8.74% | 0.79% | 5.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between OILGX and DVMHX is 0.15, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.08 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.11 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2003 | -0.06 |
The correlation between OILGX and DVMHX shifts across timeframes, from -0.06 (all time) to 0.15 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OILGX vs. DVMHX — Risk / Return Rank
OILGX
DVMHX
OILGX vs. DVMHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Optimum Large Cap Growth Fund (OILGX) and Delaware Minnesota High-Yield Municipal Bond Fund (DVMHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| OILGX | DVMHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.72 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.51 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.54 | -0.43 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.66 | 2.42 | -1.76 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.08 | 8.91 | -6.83 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
OILGX vs. DVMHX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OILGX drawdown since its inception was -54.28%, which is greater than DVMHX's maximum drawdown of -15.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OILGX and DVMHX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OILGX | DVMHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.28% | -15.73% | -38.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.31% | -3.55% | -11.76% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.75% | -7.12% | -16.63% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.97% | -15.56% | -24.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.97% | -15.56% | -24.41% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.90% | -2.47% | -5.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.45% | -1.96% | -6.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.86% | 0.96% | +3.90% |
Volatility
OILGX vs. DVMHX - Volatility Comparison
Optimum Large Cap Growth Fund (OILGX) has a higher volatility of 5.71% compared to Delaware Minnesota High-Yield Municipal Bond Fund (DVMHX) at 1.13%. This indicates that OILGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DVMHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OILGX | DVMHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.71% | 1.13% | +4.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.92% | 2.93% | +10.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.79% | 3.76% | +14.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.65% | 5.05% | +18.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.11% | 4.69% | +17.42% |
OILGX vs. DVMHX - Expense Ratio Comparison
OILGX has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than DVMHX's 0.88% expense ratio.
Dividends
OILGX vs. DVMHX - Dividend Comparison
OILGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.82%, more than DVMHX's 3.51% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DVMHX Delaware Minnesota High-Yield Municipal Bond Fund | 3.51% | 4.95% | 4.17% | 3.12% | 2.98% | 2.40% | 2.99% | 3.70% | 3.21% | 3.34% | 3.29% | 3.47% |
OILGX Optimum Large Cap Growth Fund | 13.82% | 14.05% | 20.62% | 11.50% | 4.95% | 14.42% | 7.72% | 2.98% | 14.76% | 18.13% | 3.68% | 10.49% |
Frequently Asked Questions
OILGX and DVMHX have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
OILGX has higher volatility (5.71%) compared to DVMHX (1.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OILGX dropped -54.28% vs DVMHX's -15.73%.
DVMHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for OILGX and DVMHX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer