OILD vs. IXC
OILD (MicroSectorsTM Oil & Gas Exploration & Production -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs) and IXC (iShares Global Energy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - OILD is a Inverse Equities fund tracking the Solactive MicroSectors Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Index (-300%), while IXC is a Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P Global 1200 Energy Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, OILD returned -41.86%/yr vs 14.69%/yr for IXC. At a correlation of -0.97, they often move in opposite directions. OILD charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for IXC.
Performance
OILD vs. IXC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OILD achieves a -54.54% return, which is significantly lower than IXC's 23.35% return.
OILD
- 1D
- -1.43%
- 1M
- 10.54%
- 6M
- -48.60%
- YTD
- -54.54%
- 1Y
- -59.78%
- 3Y*
- -41.86%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IXC
- 1D
- 0.51%
- 1M
- -4.50%
- 6M
- 20.68%
- YTD
- 23.35%
- 1Y
- 29.02%
- 3Y*
- 14.69%
- 5Y*
- 18.91%
- 10Y*
- 8.83%
OILD vs. IXC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OILD MicroSectorsTM Oil & Gas Exploration & Production -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs | -54.54% | -41.67% | -14.58% | -19.58% | -90.32% | 3.83% |
IXC iShares Global Energy ETF | 23.35% | 13.98% | 1.95% | 3.92% | 48.51% | -4.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between OILD and IXC is -0.96, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.96 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2021 | -0.97 |
The correlation between OILD and IXC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.97 to -0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
OILD vs. IXC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
OILD
IXC
Energy
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
Energy
OILD
IXC
Basic Materials
OILD
-
IXC
-
Communication Services
OILD
-
IXC
-
Consumer Cyclical
OILD
-
IXC
-
Consumer Defensive
OILD
-
IXC
-
Financial Services
OILD
-
IXC
-
Healthcare
OILD
-
IXC
-
Industrials
OILD
-
IXC
-
Real Estate
OILD
-
IXC
-
Technology
OILD
-
IXC
-
Utilities
OILD
-
IXC
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OILD vs. IXC — Risk / Return Rank
OILD
IXC
OILD vs. IXC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectorsTM Oil & Gas Exploration & Production -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (OILD) and iShares Global Energy ETF (IXC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| OILD | IXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.75 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.83 | 1.26 | -0.43 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.82 | 1.95 | -2.77 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.31 | 6.26 | -7.57 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
OILD vs. IXC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OILD drawdown since its inception was -98.90%, which is greater than IXC's maximum drawdown of -67.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OILD and IXC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OILD | IXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.90% | -67.88% | -31.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -74.53% | -15.36% | -59.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -86.29% | -19.06% | -67.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.93% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -64.16% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -98.52% | -11.22% | -87.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -88.77% | -17.45% | -71.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 46.48% | 4.78% | +41.70% |
Volatility
OILD vs. IXC - Volatility Comparison
MicroSectorsTM Oil & Gas Exploration & Production -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (OILD) has a higher volatility of 21.60% compared to iShares Global Energy ETF (IXC) at 6.59%. This indicates that OILD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IXC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OILD | IXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 21.60% | 6.59% | +15.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 49.90% | 15.86% | +34.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 62.68% | 19.18% | +43.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 79.24% | 23.45% | +55.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 79.24% | 26.81% | +52.43% |
OILD vs. IXC - Expense Ratio Comparison
OILD has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than IXC's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
OILD vs. IXC - Dividend Comparison
OILD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IXC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.08%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IXC iShares Global Energy ETF | 3.08% | 3.68% | 4.56% | 3.45% | 4.76% | 3.98% | 4.86% | 7.00% | 3.51% | 3.05% | 2.86% | 3.77% |
OILD MicroSectorsTM Oil & Gas Exploration & Production -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
OILD and IXC have a correlation of -0.96, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
OILD has higher volatility (21.60%) compared to IXC (6.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OILD dropped -98.90% vs IXC's -67.88%.
On 3-year performance, IXC leads with 14.69% vs -41.86% for OILD. On fees, IXC is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, IXC has been the lower-risk option at 6.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, IXC has performed better with a 14.69% return vs -41.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IXC is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for OILD.
IXC has the higher dividend yield at 3.08%, compared with 0.00% for OILD.
OILD is categorized as Inverse Equities, while IXC is Energy Equities. OILD tracks Solactive MicroSectors Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Index (-300%), while IXC tracks S&P Global 1200 Energy Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: REX and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for OILD and 0.40% for IXC.
IXC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.56 vs -0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for OILD and IXC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer