OILD vs. EFZ
OILD (MicroSectorsTM Oil & Gas Exploration & Production -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs) and EFZ (ProShares Short MSCI EAFE) are both Inverse Equities funds - OILD tracks the Solactive MicroSectors Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Index (-300%) while EFZ tracks the MSCI EAFE Index (-100%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, OILD returned -42.92%/yr vs -10.92%/yr for EFZ. Their 0.27 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.
Performance
OILD vs. EFZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OILD achieves a -62.98% return, which is significantly lower than EFZ's -10.55% return.
OILD
- 1D
- 1.27%
- 1M
- -27.98%
- 6M
- -43.08%
- YTD
- -62.98%
- 1Y
- -70.97%
- 3Y*
- -42.92%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -58.87%
EFZ
- 1D
- -1.05%
- 1M
- -2.44%
- 6M
- -6.02%
- YTD
- -10.55%
- 1Y
- -17.36%
- 3Y*
- -10.92%
- 5Y*
- -6.04%
- 10Y*
- -8.48%
- ALL TIME*
- -7.58%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $140.78K | $225.61K | $374.22K | |
| $2.68M | $2.54M | $3.73M |
OILD vs. EFZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OILD MicroSectorsTM Oil & Gas Exploration & Production -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs | -62.98% | -41.67% | -14.58% | -19.58% | -90.32% | 3.83% |
EFZ ProShares Short MSCI EAFE | -10.55% | -20.92% | 2.90% | -10.38% | 13.15% | 1.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between OILD and EFZ is -0.11, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2021 | 0.27 |
The correlation between OILD and EFZ shifts across timeframes, from -0.11 (1 year) to 0.27 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OILD vs. EFZ — Risk / Return Rank
OILD
EFZ
OILD vs. EFZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectorsTM Oil & Gas Exploration & Production -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (OILD) and ProShares Short MSCI EAFE (EFZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| OILD | EFZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.79 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.77 | 0.84 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.95 | -1.02 | +0.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.42 | -1.72 | +0.30 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
OILD vs. EFZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OILD drawdown since its inception was -98.90%, which is greater than EFZ's maximum drawdown of -88.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OILD and EFZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OILD | EFZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.90% | -88.29% | -10.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -74.53% | -17.12% | -57.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -85.42% | -36.55% | -48.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -44.75% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -62.02% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -98.80% | -88.29% | -10.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -88.92% | -67.25% | -21.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 50.00% | 10.32% | +39.68% |
Volatility
OILD vs. EFZ - Volatility Comparison
MicroSectorsTM Oil & Gas Exploration & Production -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (OILD) has a higher volatility of 20.27% compared to ProShares Short MSCI EAFE (EFZ) at 3.87%. This indicates that OILD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EFZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OILD | EFZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 20.27% | 3.87% | +16.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 50.12% | 14.09% | +36.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 63.36% | 16.67% | +46.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 79.04% | 16.84% | +62.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 79.04% | 17.12% | +61.92% |
OILD vs. EFZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both OILD and EFZ have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Dividends
OILD vs. EFZ - Dividend Comparison
OILD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EFZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.09%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFZ ProShares Short MSCI EAFE | 4.09% | 4.55% | 5.29% | 4.66% | 0.57% | 0.00% | 0.04% | 1.56% | 0.34% |
OILD MicroSectorsTM Oil & Gas Exploration & Production -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
OILD and EFZ have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
OILD has higher volatility (20.27%) compared to EFZ (3.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OILD dropped -98.90% vs EFZ's -88.29%.
On 3-year performance, EFZ leads with -10.92% vs -42.92% for OILD. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, EFZ has been the lower-risk option at 3.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, EFZ has performed better with a -10.92% return vs -42.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
OILD and EFZ have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.
EFZ has the higher dividend yield at 4.09%, compared with 0.00% for OILD.
OILD tracks Solactive MicroSectors Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Index (-300%), while EFZ tracks MSCI EAFE Index (-100%). They also come from different issuers: REX and ProShares.
EFZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-1.05 vs -1.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for OILD and EFZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer