PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OIH vs. WEEK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

OIH vs. WEEK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Vectors Oil Services ETF (OIH) and Roundhill Weekly T-Bill ETF (WEEK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OIH achieves a 54.15% return, which is significantly higher than WEEK's 1.43% return.


OIH

1D
1.80%
1M
-0.39%
YTD
54.15%
6M
45.31%
1Y
99.03%
3Y*
19.96%
5Y*
14.03%
10Y*
-1.41%

WEEK

1D
-0.01%
1M
0.26%
YTD
1.43%
6M
1.74%
1Y
3.80%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OIH vs. WEEK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
OIH
VanEck Vectors Oil Services ETF
54.15%17.00%
WEEK
Roundhill Weekly T-Bill ETF
1.43%3.37%

Correlation

The correlation between OIH and WEEK is -0.20, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 2025

-0.14

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OIH vs. WEEK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OIH
OIH Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
OIH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OIH Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
OIH Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
OIH Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
OIH Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

WEEK
WEEK Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
WEEK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WEEK Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
WEEK Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
WEEK Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
WEEK Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OIH vs. WEEK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Oil Services ETF (OIH) and Roundhill Weekly T-Bill ETF (WEEK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


OIHWEEKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-5.86

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-15.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

4.61

-3.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

10.44

29.41

-18.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

25.98

262.85

-236.87

OIH vs. WEEK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OIH Sharpe Ratio is 3.39, which is lower than the WEEK Sharpe Ratio of 9.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OIH and WEEK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


OIHWEEKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.39

9.26

-5.86

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.01

9.99

-9.99

Drawdowns

OIH vs. WEEK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OIH drawdown since its inception was -94.45%, which is greater than WEEK's maximum drawdown of -0.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OIH and WEEK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OIHWEEKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-94.45%

-0.13%

-94.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.54%

-0.13%

-9.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-43.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.80%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-89.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-60.91%

-0.01%

-60.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-48.85%

-0.01%

-48.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.82%

0.01%

+3.81%

Volatility

OIH vs. WEEK - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Vectors Oil Services ETF (OIH) has a higher volatility of 8.15% compared to Roundhill Weekly T-Bill ETF (WEEK) at 0.08%. This indicates that OIH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WEEK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OIHWEEKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.15%

0.08%

+8.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.40%

0.25%

+20.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.38%

0.41%

+28.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.80%

0.39%

+36.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

42.41%

0.39%

+42.02%

OIH vs. WEEK - Expense Ratio Comparison

OIH has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than WEEK's 0.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

OIH vs. WEEK - Dividend Comparison

OIH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.11%, less than WEEK's 3.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
OIH
VanEck Vectors Oil Services ETF
1.11%1.71%2.01%1.36%0.95%0.98%1.23%2.10%2.13%2.60%1.40%2.39%
WEEK
Roundhill Weekly T-Bill ETF
3.72%3.27%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


OIH and WEEK have a correlation of -0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

OIH has higher volatility (8.15%) compared to WEEK (0.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OIH dropped -94.45% vs WEEK's -0.13%.

On 1-year performance, OIH leads with 99.03% vs 3.80% for WEEK. On fees, WEEK is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, WEEK has been the lower-risk option at 0.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, OIH has performed better with a 99.03% return vs 3.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

WEEK is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for OIH.

WEEK has the higher dividend yield at 3.72%, compared with 1.11% for OIH.

OIH is categorized as Energy Equities, while WEEK is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for OIH and 0.19% for WEEK.

WEEK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (9.26 vs 3.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OIH and WEEK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer