PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OIH vs. RAYS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

OIH vs. RAYS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Oil Services ETF (OIH) and Global X Solar ETF (RAYS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


OIH

1D
-0.70%
1M
6.27%
6M
9.53%
YTD
34.19%
1Y
65.42%
3Y*
5.59%
5Y*
18.06%
10Y*
-2.24%
ALL TIME*
-0.07%

RAYS

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$100.78M$109.60M$140.77M
$0.00$0.00$0.00

OIH vs. RAYS - Yearly Performance Comparison


OIH vs. RAYS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
OIH
RAYS

Energy

100.0%

-

Utilities

1.9%
6.8%

Basic Materials

-

0.9%

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

4.0%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

21.4%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

66.9%

Energy

OIH
100.0%
RAYS

-

Utilities

OIH
1.9%
RAYS
6.8%

Basic Materials

OIH

-

RAYS
0.9%

Communication Services

OIH

-

RAYS

-

Consumer Cyclical

OIH

-

RAYS
4.0%

Consumer Defensive

OIH

-

RAYS

-

Financial Services

OIH

-

RAYS

-

Healthcare

OIH

-

RAYS

-

Industrials

OIH

-

RAYS
21.4%

Real Estate

OIH

-

RAYS

-

Technology

OIH

-

RAYS
66.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OIH vs. RAYS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

OIH
OIH Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
OIH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OIH Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
OIH Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
OIH Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
OIH Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

RAYS

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

OIH vs. RAYS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Oil Services ETF (OIH) and Global X Solar ETF (RAYS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


OIHRAYSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.62

OIH vs. RAYS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

OIH vs. RAYS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OIH drawdown since its inception was -94.45%, which is greater than RAYS's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OIH and RAYS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OIHRAYSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-94.45%

0.00%

-94.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-43.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.80%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-89.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-65.97%

0.00%

-65.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-48.94%

0.00%

-48.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.82%

Volatility

OIH vs. RAYS - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OIHRAYSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.39%

0.00%

+29.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.47%

0.00%

+36.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

42.31%

0.00%

+42.31%

OIH vs. RAYS - Expense Ratio Comparison

OIH has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than RAYS's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

OIH vs. RAYS - Dividend Comparison

OIH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.27%, while RAYS has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
OIH
VanEck Oil Services ETF
1.27%1.71%2.01%1.36%0.95%0.98%1.23%2.10%2.13%2.60%1.40%2.39%
RAYS
Global X Solar ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


On fees, OIH is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

OIH is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for RAYS.

OIH has the higher dividend yield at 1.27%, compared with 0.00% for RAYS.

OIH is categorized as Energy Equities, while RAYS is Alternative Energy Equities. OIH tracks MVIS US Listed Oil Services 25 Index, while RAYS tracks Solactive Solar Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for OIH and 0.50% for RAYS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OIH and RAYS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer