OIH vs. RAYS
OIH (VanEck Oil Services ETF) and RAYS (Global X Solar ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - OIH is a Energy Equities fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Oil Services 25 Index, while RAYS is a Alternative Energy Equities fund tracking the Solactive Solar Index. Both are passively managed. OIH charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for RAYS.
Performance
OIH vs. RAYS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
OIH
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- 6.27%
- 6M
- 9.53%
- YTD
- 34.19%
- 1Y
- 65.42%
- 3Y*
- 5.59%
- 5Y*
- 18.06%
- 10Y*
- -2.24%
- ALL TIME*
- -0.07%
RAYS
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $100.78M | $109.60M | $140.77M | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
OIH vs. RAYS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
OIH VanEck Oil Services ETF | 8.74% |
RAYS Global X Solar ETF | 0.00% |
OIH vs. RAYS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
OIH
RAYS
Energy
-
Utilities
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Energy
OIH
RAYS
-
Utilities
OIH
RAYS
Basic Materials
OIH
-
RAYS
Communication Services
OIH
-
RAYS
-
Consumer Cyclical
OIH
-
RAYS
Consumer Defensive
OIH
-
RAYS
-
Financial Services
OIH
-
RAYS
-
Healthcare
OIH
-
RAYS
-
Industrials
OIH
-
RAYS
Real Estate
OIH
-
RAYS
-
Technology
OIH
-
RAYS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OIH vs. RAYS — Risk / Return Rank
OIH
RAYS
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
OIH vs. RAYS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Oil Services ETF (OIH) and Global X Solar ETF (RAYS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| OIH | RAYS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.16 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.62 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
OIH vs. RAYS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OIH drawdown since its inception was -94.45%, which is greater than RAYS's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OIH and RAYS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OIH | RAYS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.45% | 0.00% | -94.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.78% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -43.80% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.80% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -89.62% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -65.97% | 0.00% | -65.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -48.94% | 0.00% | -48.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.82% | — | — |
Volatility
OIH vs. RAYS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OIH | RAYS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.97% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.96% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.39% | 0.00% | +29.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.47% | 0.00% | +36.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 42.31% | 0.00% | +42.31% |
OIH vs. RAYS - Expense Ratio Comparison
OIH has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than RAYS's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
OIH vs. RAYS - Dividend Comparison
OIH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.27%, while RAYS has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OIH VanEck Oil Services ETF | 1.27% | 1.71% | 2.01% | 1.36% | 0.95% | 0.98% | 1.23% | 2.10% | 2.13% | 2.60% | 1.40% | 2.39% |
RAYS Global X Solar ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, OIH is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
OIH is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for RAYS.
OIH has the higher dividend yield at 1.27%, compared with 0.00% for RAYS.
OIH is categorized as Energy Equities, while RAYS is Alternative Energy Equities. OIH tracks MVIS US Listed Oil Services 25 Index, while RAYS tracks Solactive Solar Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for OIH and 0.50% for RAYS.
Find the right allocation for OIH and RAYS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer