OIH vs. PBOG
OIH (VanEck Oil Services ETF) and PBOG (Portfolio Building Block Integrated Oil & Gas and Exploration & Production Index ETF) are both Energy Equities funds - OIH tracks the MVIS US Listed Oil Services 25 Index while PBOG tracks the BITA Global Oil & Gas Select Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. OIH charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for PBOG.
Performance
OIH vs. PBOG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OIH achieves a 35.03% return, which is significantly higher than PBOG's 20.33% return.
OIH
- 1D
- -1.13%
- 1M
- -13.39%
- YTD
- 35.03%
- 6M
- 35.52%
- 1Y
- 68.64%
- 3Y*
- 14.83%
- 5Y*
- 12.26%
- 10Y*
- -2.32%
PBOG
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- -9.73%
- YTD
- 20.33%
- 6M
- 21.36%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
OIH vs. PBOG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
OIH VanEck Oil Services ETF | 35.03% | 2.51% |
PBOG Portfolio Building Block Integrated Oil & Gas and Exploration & Production Index ETF | 20.33% | 1.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between OIH and PBOG is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 25, 2025 | 0.63 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OIH vs. PBOG — Risk / Return Rank
OIH
PBOG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
OIH vs. PBOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Oil Services ETF (OIH) and Portfolio Building Block Integrated Oil & Gas and Exploration & Production Index ETF (PBOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| OIH | PBOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.51 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.04 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
OIH vs. PBOG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OIH drawdown since its inception was -94.45%, which is greater than PBOG's maximum drawdown of -16.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OIH and PBOG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OIH | PBOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.45% | -16.46% | -77.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.29% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -43.80% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.80% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -89.62% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -65.76% | -15.19% | -50.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -48.87% | -3.86% | -45.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.29% | — | — |
Volatility
OIH vs. PBOG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OIH | PBOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.14% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.14% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.39% | 23.95% | +6.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.79% | 23.95% | +12.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 42.38% | 23.95% | +18.43% |
OIH vs. PBOG - Expense Ratio Comparison
OIH has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than PBOG's 0.13% expense ratio.
Dividends
OIH vs. PBOG - Dividend Comparison
OIH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.27%, more than PBOG's 0.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OIH VanEck Oil Services ETF | 1.27% | 1.71% | 2.01% | 1.36% | 0.95% | 0.98% | 1.23% | 2.10% | 2.13% | 2.60% | 1.40% | 2.39% |
PBOG Portfolio Building Block Integrated Oil & Gas and Exploration & Production Index ETF | 0.14% | 0.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
OIH and PBOG have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PBOG is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PBOG is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for OIH.
OIH has the higher dividend yield at 1.27%, compared with 0.14% for PBOG.
OIH tracks MVIS US Listed Oil Services 25 Index, while PBOG tracks BITA Global Oil & Gas Select Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Portfolio Building Blocks. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for OIH and 0.13% for PBOG.
Find the right allocation for OIH and PBOG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer