OIH vs. FENY
OIH (VanEck Vectors Oil Services ETF) and FENY (Fidelity MSCI Energy Index ETF) are both Energy Equities funds - OIH tracks the MVIS US Listed Oil Services 25 Index while FENY tracks the MSCI USA IMI Energy Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, OIH returned -0.90%/yr vs 9.57%/yr for FENY. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. OIH charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for FENY.
Performance
OIH vs. FENY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OIH achieves a 51.43% return, which is significantly higher than FENY's 32.28% return. Over the past 10 years, OIH has underperformed FENY with an annualized return of -0.90%, while FENY has yielded a comparatively higher 9.57% annualized return.
OIH
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- -2.77%
- YTD
- 51.43%
- 6M
- 43.87%
- 1Y
- 92.96%
- 3Y*
- 18.56%
- 5Y*
- 13.62%
- 10Y*
- -0.90%
FENY
- 1D
- 1.12%
- 1M
- -2.02%
- YTD
- 32.28%
- 6M
- 29.37%
- 1Y
- 45.42%
- 3Y*
- 17.98%
- 5Y*
- 20.48%
- 10Y*
- 9.57%
OIH vs. FENY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OIH VanEck Vectors Oil Services ETF | 51.43% | 6.81% | -10.53% | 3.20% | 66.17% | 21.22% | -41.19% | -3.54% | -45.03% | -19.66% |
FENY Fidelity MSCI Energy Index ETF | 32.28% | 7.27% | 6.62% | -0.04% | 62.94% | 55.62% | -33.15% | 9.11% | -19.99% | -2.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between OIH and FENY is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2013 | 0.89 |
The correlation between OIH and FENY shifts across timeframes, from 0.75 (1 year) to 0.89 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
OIH vs. FENY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
OIH
FENY
Energy
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Energy
OIH
FENY
Utilities
OIH
FENY
-
Basic Materials
OIH
-
FENY
Communication Services
OIH
-
FENY
-
Consumer Cyclical
OIH
-
FENY
-
Consumer Defensive
OIH
-
FENY
-
Financial Services
OIH
-
FENY
-
Healthcare
OIH
-
FENY
-
Industrials
OIH
-
FENY
Real Estate
OIH
-
FENY
-
Technology
OIH
-
FENY
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OIH vs. FENY — Risk / Return Rank
OIH
FENY
OIH vs. FENY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Oil Services ETF (OIH) and Fidelity MSCI Energy Index ETF (FENY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| OIH | FENY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.19 | 2.24 | +0.94 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.87 | 2.87 | +1.00 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.36 | +0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 9.80 | 3.87 | +5.93 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 24.42 | 11.41 | +13.01 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| OIH | FENY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.19 | 2.24 | +0.94 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 | 0.78 | -0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.02 | 0.32 | -0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.01 | 0.20 | -0.19 |
Drawdowns
OIH vs. FENY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OIH drawdown since its inception was -94.45%, which is greater than FENY's maximum drawdown of -74.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OIH and FENY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OIH | FENY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.45% | -74.35% | -20.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.54% | -11.78% | +2.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -43.80% | -21.47% | -22.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.80% | -26.64% | -17.16% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -89.62% | -69.07% | -20.55% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -61.60% | -6.35% | -55.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -48.84% | -23.12% | -25.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.82% | 3.99% | -0.17% |
Volatility
OIH vs. FENY - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Vectors Oil Services ETF (OIH) and Fidelity MSCI Energy Index ETF (FENY) have volatilities of 7.95% and 7.96%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OIH | FENY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.95% | 7.96% | -0.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.36% | 16.33% | +4.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.49% | 20.39% | +9.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.79% | 26.46% | +10.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 42.41% | 29.80% | +12.61% |
OIH vs. FENY - Expense Ratio Comparison
OIH has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than FENY's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
OIH vs. FENY - Dividend Comparison
OIH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.13%, less than FENY's 2.41% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FENY Fidelity MSCI Energy Index ETF | 2.41% | 3.18% | 3.05% | 3.33% | 3.33% | 3.69% | 4.60% | 6.43% | 3.21% | 2.94% | 2.29% | 3.05% |
OIH VanEck Vectors Oil Services ETF | 1.13% | 1.71% | 2.01% | 1.36% | 0.95% | 0.98% | 1.23% | 2.10% | 2.13% | 2.60% | 1.40% | 2.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
OIH and FENY have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FENY has higher volatility (7.96%) compared to OIH (7.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OIH dropped -94.45% vs FENY's -74.35%.
On 10-year performance, FENY leads with 9.57% vs -0.90% for OIH. On fees, FENY is cheaper at 0.08% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, FENY has performed better with a 9.57% return vs -0.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FENY is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for OIH.
FENY has the higher dividend yield at 2.41%, compared with 1.13% for OIH.
OIH tracks MVIS US Listed Oil Services 25 Index, while FENY tracks MSCI USA IMI Energy Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for OIH and 0.08% for FENY.
OIH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.19 vs 2.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for OIH and FENY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer