PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OIH vs. FENY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

OIH vs. FENY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Oil Services ETF (OIH) and Fidelity MSCI Energy Index ETF (FENY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with OIH having a 34.19% return and FENY slightly lower at 33.41%. Over the past 10 years, OIH has underperformed FENY with an annualized return of -2.24%, while FENY has yielded a comparatively higher 9.51% annualized return.


OIH

1D
-0.70%
1M
6.27%
6M
9.53%
YTD
34.19%
1Y
65.42%
3Y*
5.59%
5Y*
18.06%
10Y*
-2.24%
ALL TIME*
-0.07%

FENY

1D
-1.27%
1M
10.16%
6M
19.12%
YTD
33.41%
1Y
42.08%
3Y*
14.32%
5Y*
23.89%
10Y*
9.51%
ALL TIME*
5.52%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$46.38M$43.19M$52.93M
$100.78M$109.60M$140.77M

OIH vs. FENY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
OIH
VanEck Oil Services ETF
34.19%6.81%-10.53%3.20%66.17%21.22%-41.19%-3.54%-45.03%-19.66%
FENY
Fidelity MSCI Energy Index ETF
33.41%7.27%6.62%-0.04%62.94%55.62%-33.15%9.11%-19.99%-2.30%

Correlation

The correlation between OIH and FENY is 0.72, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.86

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2013

0.88

The correlation between OIH and FENY shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (1 year) to 0.88 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

OIH vs. FENY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
OIH
FENY

Energy

100.0%
99.6%

Utilities

1.9%
0.1%

Basic Materials

-

0.3%

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

0.1%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Energy

OIH
100.0%
FENY
99.6%

Utilities

OIH
1.9%
FENY
0.1%

Basic Materials

OIH

-

FENY
0.3%

Communication Services

OIH

-

FENY

-

Consumer Cyclical

OIH

-

FENY

-

Consumer Defensive

OIH

-

FENY

-

Financial Services

OIH

-

FENY

-

Healthcare

OIH

-

FENY

-

Industrials

OIH

-

FENY
0.1%

Real Estate

OIH

-

FENY

-

Technology

OIH

-

FENY

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OIH vs. FENY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

OIH
OIH Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
OIH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OIH Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
OIH Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
OIH Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
OIH Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

FENY
FENY Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
FENY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FENY Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
FENY Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
FENY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
FENY Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

OIH vs. FENY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Oil Services ETF (OIH) and Fidelity MSCI Energy Index ETF (FENY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


OIHFENYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.33

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.16

2.83

+0.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.62

7.61

+2.01

OIH vs. FENY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OIH Sharpe Ratio is 2.24, which is comparable to the FENY Sharpe Ratio of 2.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OIH and FENY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

OIH vs. FENY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OIH drawdown since its inception was -94.45%, which is greater than FENY's maximum drawdown of -74.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OIH and FENY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OIHFENYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-94.45%

-74.35%

-20.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.78%

-14.96%

-5.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-43.80%

-21.47%

-22.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.80%

-26.64%

-17.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-89.62%

-69.07%

-20.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-65.97%

-5.56%

-60.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-48.94%

-22.94%

-26.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.82%

5.54%

+1.28%

Volatility

OIH vs. FENY - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Oil Services ETF (OIH) has a higher volatility of 7.97% compared to Fidelity MSCI Energy Index ETF (FENY) at 6.23%. This indicates that OIH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FENY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OIHFENYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.97%

6.23%

+1.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.96%

16.66%

+4.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.39%

20.91%

+8.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.47%

26.20%

+10.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

42.31%

29.78%

+12.53%

OIH vs. FENY - Expense Ratio Comparison

OIH has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than FENY's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

OIH vs. FENY - Dividend Comparison

OIH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.27%, less than FENY's 2.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FENY
Fidelity MSCI Energy Index ETF
2.38%3.18%3.05%3.33%3.33%3.69%4.60%6.43%3.21%2.94%2.29%3.05%
OIH
VanEck Oil Services ETF
1.27%1.71%2.01%1.36%0.95%0.98%1.23%2.10%2.13%2.60%1.40%2.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


OIH and FENY have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

OIH has higher volatility (7.97%) compared to FENY (6.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OIH dropped -94.45% vs FENY's -74.35%.

On 10-year performance, FENY leads with 9.51% vs -2.24% for OIH. On fees, FENY is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, FENY has been the lower-risk option at 6.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FENY has performed better with a 9.51% return vs -2.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FENY is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for OIH.

FENY has the higher dividend yield at 2.38%, compared with 1.27% for OIH.

OIH tracks MVIS US Listed Oil Services 25 Index, while FENY tracks MSCI USA IMI Energy 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for OIH and 0.08% for FENY.

OIH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 2.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OIH and FENY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer