PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OIH vs. ERX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

OIH vs. ERX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Vectors Oil Services ETF (OIH) and Direxion Daily Energy Bull 2X Shares (ERX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OIH achieves a 51.43% return, which is significantly lower than ERX's 66.93% return. Over the past 10 years, OIH has outperformed ERX with an annualized return of -0.90%, while ERX has yielded a comparatively lower -8.79% annualized return.


OIH

1D
0.18%
1M
-2.77%
YTD
51.43%
6M
43.87%
1Y
92.96%
3Y*
18.56%
5Y*
13.62%
10Y*
-0.90%

ERX

1D
2.68%
1M
-3.38%
YTD
66.93%
6M
59.74%
1Y
90.37%
3Y*
23.69%
5Y*
28.75%
10Y*
-8.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OIH vs. ERX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
OIH
VanEck Vectors Oil Services ETF
51.43%6.81%-10.53%3.20%66.17%21.22%-41.19%-3.54%-45.03%-19.66%
ERX
Direxion Daily Energy Bull 2X Shares
66.93%2.79%1.09%-12.26%130.58%111.91%-91.60%17.13%-55.94%-11.60%

Correlation

The correlation between OIH and ERX is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2008

0.88

The correlation between OIH and ERX shifts across timeframes, from 0.74 (1 year) to 0.88 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

OIH vs. ERX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
OIH
ERX

Energy

98.0%
100.0%

Utilities

1.8%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Energy

OIH
98.0%
ERX
100.0%

Utilities

OIH
1.8%
ERX

-

Basic Materials

OIH

-

ERX

-

Communication Services

OIH

-

ERX

-

Consumer Cyclical

OIH

-

ERX

-

Consumer Defensive

OIH

-

ERX

-

Financial Services

OIH

-

ERX

-

Healthcare

OIH

-

ERX

-

Industrials

OIH

-

ERX

-

Real Estate

OIH

-

ERX

-

Technology

OIH

-

ERX

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OIH vs. ERX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OIH
OIH Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
OIH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OIH Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
OIH Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
OIH Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
OIH Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

ERX
ERX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
ERX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ERX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
ERX Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
ERX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
ERX Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OIH vs. ERX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Oil Services ETF (OIH) and Direxion Daily Energy Bull 2X Shares (ERX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


OIHERXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.19

2.21

+0.97

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.87

2.62

+1.26

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.32

+0.16

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

9.80

3.89

+5.91

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

24.42

10.60

+13.83

OIH vs. ERX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OIH Sharpe Ratio is 3.19, which is higher than the ERX Sharpe Ratio of 2.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OIH and ERX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


OIHERXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.19

2.21

+0.97

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

0.56

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.02

-0.13

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.01

-0.09

+0.09

Drawdowns

OIH vs. ERX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OIH drawdown since its inception was -94.45%, smaller than the maximum ERX drawdown of -99.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OIH and ERX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OIHERXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-94.45%

-99.54%

+5.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.54%

-23.34%

+13.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-43.80%

-42.34%

-1.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.80%

-46.90%

+3.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-89.62%

-98.59%

+8.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-61.60%

-91.57%

+29.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-48.84%

-67.02%

+18.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.82%

8.57%

-4.75%

Volatility

OIH vs. ERX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Vectors Oil Services ETF (OIH) is 7.95%, while Direxion Daily Energy Bull 2X Shares (ERX) has a volatility of 16.49%. This indicates that OIH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ERX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OIHERXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.95%

16.49%

-8.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.36%

33.45%

-13.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.49%

41.14%

-11.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.79%

51.98%

-15.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

42.41%

69.18%

-26.77%

OIH vs. ERX - Expense Ratio Comparison

OIH has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than ERX's 1.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

OIH vs. ERX - Dividend Comparison

OIH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.13%, less than ERX's 1.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ERX
Direxion Daily Energy Bull 2X Shares
1.61%2.54%2.94%3.17%2.23%2.16%2.35%1.56%3.10%0.85%0.00%0.00%
OIH
VanEck Vectors Oil Services ETF
1.13%1.71%2.01%1.36%0.95%0.98%1.23%2.10%2.13%2.60%1.40%2.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


OIH and ERX have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ERX has higher volatility (16.49%) compared to OIH (7.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OIH dropped -94.45% vs ERX's -99.54%.

On 10-year performance, OIH leads with -0.90% vs -8.79% for ERX. On fees, OIH is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, OIH has been the lower-risk option at 7.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, OIH has performed better with a -0.90% return vs -8.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

OIH is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 1.09% for ERX.

ERX has the higher dividend yield at 1.61%, compared with 1.13% for OIH.

OIH is categorized as Energy Equities, while ERX is Leveraged Equities. OIH tracks MVIS US Listed Oil Services 25 Index, while ERX tracks Energy Select Sector Index (300%). They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for OIH and 1.09% for ERX.

OIH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.19 vs 2.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OIH and ERX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer