PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OEPIX vs. TMLPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

OEPIX vs. TMLPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Oil Equipment & Services UltraSector ProFund (OEPIX) and Transamerica Energy Infrastructure (TMLPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OEPIX achieves a 80.23% return, which is significantly higher than TMLPX's 21.52% return. Over the past 10 years, OEPIX has underperformed TMLPX with an annualized return of -20.60%, while TMLPX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.38% annualized return.


OEPIX

1D
-0.84%
1M
-6.70%
YTD
80.23%
6M
64.45%
1Y
163.81%
3Y*
20.45%
5Y*
11.51%
10Y*
-20.60%

TMLPX

1D
0.00%
1M
-2.59%
YTD
21.52%
6M
19.14%
1Y
24.05%
3Y*
22.94%
5Y*
15.29%
10Y*
9.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OEPIX vs. TMLPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
OEPIX
Oil Equipment & Services UltraSector ProFund
80.23%-1.85%-15.41%-3.76%88.50%14.90%-91.88%-4.45%-58.58%-22.70%
TMLPX
Transamerica Energy Infrastructure
21.52%3.87%38.51%5.07%9.12%23.54%-11.25%15.66%-15.29%-0.19%

Correlation

The correlation between OEPIX and TMLPX is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.57

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2014

0.72

Over the past year, the correlation between OEPIX and TMLPX has dropped to 0.44 - well below their long-term average of 0.72, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OEPIX vs. TMLPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OEPIX
OEPIX Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
OEPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OEPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
OEPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
OEPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
OEPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

TMLPX
TMLPX Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
TMLPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TMLPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
TMLPX Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
TMLPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
TMLPX Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OEPIX vs. TMLPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Oil Equipment & Services UltraSector ProFund (OEPIX) and Transamerica Energy Infrastructure (TMLPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


OEPIXTMLPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.91

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.27

+0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

10.85

3.12

+7.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

28.59

8.93

+19.66

OEPIX vs. TMLPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OEPIX Sharpe Ratio is 3.50, which is higher than the TMLPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OEPIX and TMLPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


OEPIXTMLPXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.50

1.59

+1.91

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

0.89

-0.69

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.31

0.43

-0.74

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.24

0.23

-0.47

Drawdowns

OEPIX vs. TMLPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OEPIX drawdown since its inception was -99.30%, which is greater than TMLPX's maximum drawdown of -67.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OEPIX and TMLPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OEPIXTMLPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.30%

-67.18%

-32.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.61%

-7.12%

-7.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-65.50%

-16.60%

-48.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-65.50%

-16.60%

-48.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-97.79%

-55.61%

-42.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-97.66%

-5.23%

-92.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-72.07%

-22.58%

-49.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.54%

2.49%

+3.05%

Volatility

OEPIX vs. TMLPX - Volatility Comparison

Oil Equipment & Services UltraSector ProFund (OEPIX) has a higher volatility of 12.18% compared to Transamerica Energy Infrastructure (TMLPX) at 6.02%. This indicates that OEPIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TMLPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OEPIXTMLPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.18%

6.02%

+6.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.54%

10.79%

+19.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

45.69%

14.00%

+31.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

56.75%

17.23%

+39.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

66.62%

21.80%

+44.82%

OEPIX vs. TMLPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

OEPIX has a 1.65% expense ratio, which is higher than TMLPX's 1.26% expense ratio.


Dividends

OEPIX vs. TMLPX - Dividend Comparison

OEPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.48%, less than TMLPX's 3.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
OEPIX
Oil Equipment & Services UltraSector ProFund
0.48%0.87%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.16%0.00%2.56%2.36%0.05%0.00%
TMLPX
Transamerica Energy Infrastructure
3.72%4.33%3.71%7.34%4.83%4.33%6.09%5.65%6.10%5.51%3.95%5.58%

Frequently Asked Questions


OEPIX and TMLPX have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

OEPIX has higher volatility (12.18%) compared to TMLPX (6.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OEPIX dropped -99.30% vs TMLPX's -67.18%.

OEPIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.50 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OEPIX and TMLPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer