OEPIX vs. GLPIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Oil Equipment & Services UltraSector ProFund (OEPIX) and Goldman Sachs MLP Energy Infrastructure Fund (GLPIX).
OEPIX is managed by ProFunds. It was launched on Jun 4, 2006. GLPIX is managed by Goldman Sachs. It was launched on Mar 27, 2013.
Performance
OEPIX vs. GLPIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
OEPIX vs. GLPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OEPIX Oil Equipment & Services UltraSector ProFund | 65.25% | -1.85% | -15.41% | -3.76% | 88.50% | 14.90% | -91.88% | -4.45% | -58.58% | -22.70% |
GLPIX Goldman Sachs MLP Energy Infrastructure Fund | 16.94% | 4.45% | 28.00% | 19.67% | 26.06% | 39.89% | -31.08% | 7.04% | -14.57% | -5.13% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OEPIX achieves a 65.25% return, which is significantly higher than GLPIX's 16.94% return. Over the past 10 years, OEPIX has underperformed GLPIX with an annualized return of -20.24%, while GLPIX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.37% annualized return.
OEPIX
- 1D
- -4.86%
- 1M
- 3.27%
- YTD
- 65.25%
- 6M
- 96.48%
- 1Y
- 90.65%
- 3Y*
- 15.75%
- 5Y*
- 17.42%
- 10Y*
- -20.24%
GLPIX
- 1D
- -0.59%
- 1M
- 2.56%
- YTD
- 16.94%
- 6M
- 19.22%
- 1Y
- 13.69%
- 3Y*
- 22.54%
- 5Y*
- 22.87%
- 10Y*
- 10.37%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
OEPIX vs. GLPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
OEPIX has a 1.65% expense ratio, which is higher than GLPIX's 1.20% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
OEPIX vs. GLPIX — Risk / Return Rank
OEPIX
GLPIX
OEPIX vs. GLPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Oil Equipment & Services UltraSector ProFund (OEPIX) and Goldman Sachs MLP Energy Infrastructure Fund (GLPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| OEPIX | GLPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.52 | 0.87 | +0.64 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.97 | 1.18 | +0.79 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.18 | +0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.18 | 0.96 | +1.22 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.61 | 2.41 | +3.20 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| OEPIX | GLPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.52 | 0.87 | +0.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 | 1.20 | -0.89 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.30 | 0.40 | -0.70 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.25 | 0.19 | -0.44 |
Correlation
The correlation between OEPIX and GLPIX is 0.72, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
OEPIX vs. GLPIX - Dividend Comparison
OEPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.53%, less than GLPIX's 6.21% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OEPIX Oil Equipment & Services UltraSector ProFund | 0.53% | 0.87% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 2.56% | 2.36% | 0.05% | 0.00% |
GLPIX Goldman Sachs MLP Energy Infrastructure Fund | 6.21% | 7.03% | 6.60% | 6.70% | 6.00% | 6.26% | 9.72% | 8.67% | 8.02% | 7.49% | 11.46% | 6.62% |
Drawdowns
OEPIX vs. GLPIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OEPIX drawdown since its inception was -99.30%, which is greater than GLPIX's maximum drawdown of -75.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OEPIX and GLPIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| OEPIX | GLPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.30% | -75.98% | -23.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -39.36% | -13.62% | -25.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -65.50% | -20.89% | -44.61% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -97.79% | -70.48% | -27.31% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -97.86% | -1.00% | -96.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -71.84% | -23.44% | -48.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.28% | 5.41% | +9.87% |
Volatility
OEPIX vs. GLPIX - Volatility Comparison
Oil Equipment & Services UltraSector ProFund (OEPIX) has a higher volatility of 11.57% compared to Goldman Sachs MLP Energy Infrastructure Fund (GLPIX) at 3.17%. This indicates that OEPIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLPIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| OEPIX | GLPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.57% | 3.17% | +8.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.14% | 7.52% | +25.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 60.15% | 15.45% | +44.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 57.70% | 19.22% | +38.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 66.61% | 26.09% | +40.52% |