OEF vs. SPMO
OEF (iShares S&P 100 ETF) and SPMO (Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - OEF is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the S&P 100 Index, while SPMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P 500 Momentum Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, OEF returned 16.71%/yr vs 20.95%/yr for SPMO. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. OEF charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for SPMO.
Performance
OEF vs. SPMO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OEF achieves a 9.51% return, which is significantly lower than SPMO's 30.35% return. Over the past 10 years, OEF has underperformed SPMO with an annualized return of 16.71%, while SPMO has yielded a comparatively higher 20.95% annualized return.
OEF
- 1D
- -0.87%
- 1M
- 5.44%
- YTD
- 9.51%
- 6M
- 9.34%
- 1Y
- 29.54%
- 3Y*
- 24.53%
- 5Y*
- 15.70%
- 10Y*
- 16.71%
SPMO
- 1D
- 0.50%
- 1M
- 15.36%
- YTD
- 30.35%
- 6M
- 30.51%
- 1Y
- 46.00%
- 3Y*
- 43.04%
- 5Y*
- 24.29%
- 10Y*
- 20.95%
OEF vs. SPMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OEF iShares S&P 100 ETF | 9.51% | 19.80% | 30.74% | 32.71% | -21.03% | 29.18% | 21.21% | 31.87% | -4.16% | 21.82% |
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 30.35% | 26.58% | 45.82% | 17.56% | -10.45% | 22.64% | 28.25% | 25.93% | -0.92% | 27.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between OEF and SPMO is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 2015 | 0.78 |
The correlation between OEF and SPMO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.
OEF vs. SPMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
OEF
SPMO
Technology
Communication Services
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Energy
Utilities
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Technology
OEF
SPMO
Communication Services
OEF
SPMO
Financial Services
OEF
SPMO
Consumer Cyclical
OEF
SPMO
Healthcare
OEF
SPMO
Consumer Defensive
OEF
SPMO
Industrials
OEF
SPMO
Energy
OEF
SPMO
Utilities
OEF
SPMO
Basic Materials
OEF
SPMO
Real Estate
OEF
SPMO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OEF vs. SPMO — Risk / Return Rank
OEF
SPMO
OEF vs. SPMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 100 ETF (OEF) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| OEF | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.47 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.68 | 3.64 | -0.95 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.29 | 14.17 | -2.87 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| OEF | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.33 | 2.62 | -0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.89 | 1.27 | -0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.91 | 1.03 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 1.01 | -0.56 |
Drawdowns
OEF vs. SPMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OEF drawdown since its inception was -54.11%, which is greater than SPMO's maximum drawdown of -30.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OEF and SPMO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OEF | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.11% | -30.95% | -23.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.06% | -12.70% | +1.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.80% | -20.13% | +0.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.47% | -22.74% | -3.73% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.44% | -30.95% | -0.49% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.94% | 0.00% | -0.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.76% | -4.60% | -7.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.62% | 3.26% | -0.64% |
Volatility
OEF vs. SPMO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares S&P 100 ETF (OEF) is 3.14%, while Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) has a volatility of 7.35%. This indicates that OEF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OEF | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.14% | 7.35% | -4.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.48% | 14.39% | -4.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.73% | 17.64% | -4.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.69% | 19.30% | -1.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.44% | 20.31% | -1.87% |
OEF vs. SPMO - Expense Ratio Comparison
OEF has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than SPMO's 0.13% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
OEF vs. SPMO - Dividend Comparison
OEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.83%, more than SPMO's 0.65% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OEF iShares S&P 100 ETF | 0.83% | 0.81% | 1.03% | 1.19% | 1.55% | 1.06% | 1.43% | 1.87% | 2.09% | 1.81% | 2.07% | 2.11% |
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 0.65% | 0.73% | 0.48% | 1.63% | 1.66% | 0.52% | 1.27% | 1.39% | 1.05% | 0.77% | 1.94% | 0.36% |
Frequently Asked Questions
OEF and SPMO have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPMO has higher volatility (7.35%) compared to OEF (3.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OEF dropped -54.11% vs SPMO's -30.95%.
On 10-year performance, SPMO leads with 20.95% vs 16.71% for OEF. On fees, SPMO is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, OEF has been the lower-risk option at 3.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPMO has performed better with a 20.95% return vs 16.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPMO is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for OEF.
OEF has the higher dividend yield at 0.83%, compared with 0.65% for SPMO.
OEF is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while SPMO is Momentum. OEF tracks S&P 100 Index, while SPMO tracks S&P 500 Momentum Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for OEF and 0.13% for SPMO.
SPMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.62 vs 2.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for OEF and SPMO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer