PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OEF vs. ITOT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

OEF vs. ITOT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares S&P 100 ETF (OEF) and iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OEF achieves a 9.51% return, which is significantly lower than ITOT's 11.25% return. Over the past 10 years, OEF has outperformed ITOT with an annualized return of 16.71%, while ITOT has yielded a comparatively lower 15.01% annualized return.


OEF

1D
-0.87%
1M
5.44%
YTD
9.51%
6M
9.34%
1Y
29.54%
3Y*
24.53%
5Y*
15.70%
10Y*
16.71%

ITOT

1D
-0.73%
1M
5.01%
YTD
11.25%
6M
11.12%
1Y
28.12%
3Y*
22.09%
5Y*
12.69%
10Y*
15.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OEF vs. ITOT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
OEF
iShares S&P 100 ETF
9.51%19.80%30.74%32.71%-21.03%29.18%21.21%31.87%-4.16%21.82%
ITOT
iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF
11.25%17.00%23.80%26.12%-19.47%25.68%20.71%30.67%-5.33%21.37%

Correlation

The correlation between OEF and ITOT is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 26, 2004

0.96

The correlation between OEF and ITOT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

OEF vs. ITOT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
OEF
ITOT

Technology

41.0%
33.8%

Communication Services

14.5%
10.3%

Financial Services

10.7%
12.1%

Consumer Cyclical

10.5%
10.1%

Healthcare

8.3%
9.0%

Consumer Defensive

5.4%
4.7%

Industrials

5.3%
9.5%

Energy

2.6%
3.7%

Utilities

0.9%
2.3%

Basic Materials

0.5%
2.1%

Real Estate

0.3%
2.4%

Technology

OEF
41.0%
ITOT
33.8%

Communication Services

OEF
14.5%
ITOT
10.3%

Financial Services

OEF
10.7%
ITOT
12.1%

Consumer Cyclical

OEF
10.5%
ITOT
10.1%

Healthcare

OEF
8.3%
ITOT
9.0%

Consumer Defensive

OEF
5.4%
ITOT
4.7%

Industrials

OEF
5.3%
ITOT
9.5%

Energy

OEF
2.6%
ITOT
3.7%

Utilities

OEF
0.9%
ITOT
2.3%

Basic Materials

OEF
0.5%
ITOT
2.1%

Real Estate

OEF
0.3%
ITOT
2.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OEF vs. ITOT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OEF
OEF Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
OEF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OEF Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
OEF Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
OEF Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
OEF Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

ITOT
ITOT Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
ITOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ITOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
ITOT Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
ITOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
ITOT Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OEF vs. ITOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 100 ETF (OEF) and iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


OEFITOTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.42

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.68

3.17

-0.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.29

14.57

-3.28

OEF vs. ITOT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OEF Sharpe Ratio is 2.33, which is comparable to the ITOT Sharpe Ratio of 2.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OEF and ITOT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


OEFITOTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.33

2.32

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

0.74

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

0.82

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.57

-0.13

Drawdowns

OEF vs. ITOT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OEF drawdown since its inception was -54.11%, roughly equal to the maximum ITOT drawdown of -55.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OEF and ITOT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OEFITOTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.11%

-55.20%

+1.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.06%

-8.90%

-2.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.80%

-19.44%

-0.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.47%

-25.36%

-1.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.44%

-35.00%

+3.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.94%

-0.73%

-0.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.76%

-6.97%

-4.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.62%

1.94%

+0.68%

Volatility

OEF vs. ITOT - Volatility Comparison

iShares S&P 100 ETF (OEF) has a higher volatility of 3.14% compared to iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT) at 2.99%. This indicates that OEF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ITOT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OEFITOTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.14%

2.99%

+0.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.48%

9.13%

+0.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.73%

12.20%

+0.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.69%

17.36%

+0.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.44%

18.26%

+0.18%

OEF vs. ITOT - Expense Ratio Comparison

OEF has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than ITOT's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

OEF vs. ITOT - Dividend Comparison

OEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.83%, less than ITOT's 0.98% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ITOT
iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF
0.98%1.11%1.23%1.47%1.66%1.18%1.41%1.88%2.14%1.69%1.83%2.01%
OEF
iShares S&P 100 ETF
0.83%0.81%1.03%1.19%1.55%1.06%1.43%1.87%2.09%1.81%2.07%2.11%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, OEF and ITOT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

OEF has higher volatility (3.14%) compared to ITOT (2.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OEF dropped -54.11% vs ITOT's -55.20%.

On 10-year performance, OEF leads with 16.71% vs 15.01% for ITOT. On fees, ITOT is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, ITOT has been the lower-risk option at 2.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, OEF has performed better with a 16.71% return vs 15.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ITOT is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for OEF.

ITOT has the higher dividend yield at 0.98%, compared with 0.83% for OEF.

OEF is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while ITOT is Large Cap Blend Equities. OEF tracks S&P 100 Index, while ITOT tracks S&P Total Market Index. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for OEF and 0.03% for ITOT.

OEF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 2.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OEF and ITOT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer