PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OEF vs. GRW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

OEF vs. GRW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares S&P 100 ETF (OEF) and TCW Durable Growth ETF (GRW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


OEF

1D
-0.87%
1M
5.44%
YTD
9.51%
6M
9.34%
1Y
29.54%
3Y*
24.53%
5Y*
15.70%
10Y*
16.71%

GRW

1D
-0.32%
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OEF vs. GRW - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between OEF and GRW is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026

1.00

OEF vs. GRW - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
OEF
GRW

Technology

41.0%
26.6%

Communication Services

14.5%
9.1%

Financial Services

10.7%
9.8%

Consumer Cyclical

10.5%
8.3%

Healthcare

8.3%
4.1%

Consumer Defensive

5.4%

-

Industrials

5.3%
38.1%

Energy

2.6%

-

Utilities

0.9%

-

Basic Materials

0.5%
4.0%

Real Estate

0.3%

-

Technology

OEF
41.0%
GRW
26.6%

Communication Services

OEF
14.5%
GRW
9.1%

Financial Services

OEF
10.7%
GRW
9.8%

Consumer Cyclical

OEF
10.5%
GRW
8.3%

Healthcare

OEF
8.3%
GRW
4.1%

Consumer Defensive

OEF
5.4%
GRW

-

Industrials

OEF
5.3%
GRW
38.1%

Energy

OEF
2.6%
GRW

-

Utilities

OEF
0.9%
GRW

-

Basic Materials

OEF
0.5%
GRW
4.0%

Real Estate

OEF
0.3%
GRW

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OEF vs. GRW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OEF
OEF Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
OEF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OEF Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
OEF Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
OEF Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
OEF Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

GRW
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OEF vs. GRW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 100 ETF (OEF) and TCW Durable Growth ETF (GRW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


OEFGRWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.29

OEF vs. GRW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


OEFGRWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

14.00

-13.55

Drawdowns

OEF vs. GRW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OEF drawdown since its inception was -54.11%, which is greater than GRW's maximum drawdown of -0.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OEF and GRW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OEFGRWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.11%

-0.45%

-53.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.94%

-0.45%

-0.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.76%

-0.14%

-11.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.62%

Volatility

OEF vs. GRW - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OEFGRWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.73%

10.19%

+2.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.69%

10.19%

+7.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.44%

10.19%

+8.25%

OEF vs. GRW - Expense Ratio Comparison

OEF has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than GRW's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

OEF vs. GRW - Dividend Comparison

OEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.83%, while GRW has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GRW
TCW Durable Growth ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
OEF
iShares S&P 100 ETF
0.83%0.81%1.03%1.19%1.55%1.06%1.43%1.87%2.09%1.81%2.07%2.11%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, OEF and GRW move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, OEF is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

OEF is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for GRW.

OEF has the higher dividend yield at 0.83%, compared with 0.00% for GRW.

OEF is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while GRW is Large Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: iShares and TCW. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for OEF and 0.75% for GRW.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OEF and GRW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer