OEF vs. GRW
OEF (iShares S&P 100 ETF) and GRW (TCW Durable Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - OEF is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the S&P 100 Index, while GRW is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by TCW. OEF is passively managed, while GRW is actively managed. With a 1.00 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. OEF charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for GRW.
Performance
OEF vs. GRW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
OEF
- 1D
- -0.87%
- 1M
- 5.44%
- YTD
- 9.51%
- 6M
- 9.34%
- 1Y
- 29.54%
- 3Y*
- 24.53%
- 5Y*
- 15.70%
- 10Y*
- 16.71%
GRW
- 1D
- -0.32%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
OEF vs. GRW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
OEF iShares S&P 100 ETF | -0.51% |
GRW TCW Durable Growth ETF | 1.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between OEF and GRW is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026 | 1.00 |
OEF vs. GRW - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
OEF
GRW
Technology
Communication Services
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
-
Industrials
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
Real Estate
-
Technology
OEF
GRW
Communication Services
OEF
GRW
Financial Services
OEF
GRW
Consumer Cyclical
OEF
GRW
Healthcare
OEF
GRW
Consumer Defensive
OEF
GRW
-
Industrials
OEF
GRW
Energy
OEF
GRW
-
Utilities
OEF
GRW
-
Basic Materials
OEF
GRW
Real Estate
OEF
GRW
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OEF vs. GRW — Risk / Return Rank
OEF
GRW
OEF vs. GRW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 100 ETF (OEF) and TCW Durable Growth ETF (GRW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| OEF | GRW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.68 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.29 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| OEF | GRW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.33 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.89 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.91 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 14.00 | -13.55 |
Drawdowns
OEF vs. GRW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OEF drawdown since its inception was -54.11%, which is greater than GRW's maximum drawdown of -0.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OEF and GRW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OEF | GRW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.11% | -0.45% | -53.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.06% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.80% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.47% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.44% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.94% | -0.45% | -0.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.76% | -0.14% | -11.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.62% | — | — |
Volatility
OEF vs. GRW - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OEF | GRW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.14% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.48% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.73% | 10.19% | +2.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.69% | 10.19% | +7.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.44% | 10.19% | +8.25% |
OEF vs. GRW - Expense Ratio Comparison
OEF has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than GRW's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
OEF vs. GRW - Dividend Comparison
OEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.83%, while GRW has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GRW TCW Durable Growth ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
OEF iShares S&P 100 ETF | 0.83% | 0.81% | 1.03% | 1.19% | 1.55% | 1.06% | 1.43% | 1.87% | 2.09% | 1.81% | 2.07% | 2.11% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 1.00, OEF and GRW move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, OEF is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
OEF is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for GRW.
OEF has the higher dividend yield at 0.83%, compared with 0.00% for GRW.
OEF is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while GRW is Large Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: iShares and TCW. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for OEF and 0.75% for GRW.
Find the right allocation for OEF and GRW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer