OCTW vs. PSMR
OCTW (AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Oct ETF) and PSMR (Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds. OCTW is passively managed, while PSMR is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, OCTW returned 8.85%/yr vs 8.52%/yr for PSMR. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. OCTW charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.61%/yr for PSMR.
Performance
OCTW vs. PSMR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OCTW achieves a 4.65% return, which is significantly lower than PSMR's 7.68% return.
OCTW
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- 1.67%
- YTD
- 4.65%
- 6M
- 5.17%
- 1Y
- 12.50%
- 3Y*
- 10.88%
- 5Y*
- 8.85%
- 10Y*
- —
PSMR
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- 1.54%
- YTD
- 7.68%
- 6M
- 8.38%
- 1Y
- 14.83%
- 3Y*
- 11.71%
- 5Y*
- 8.52%
- 10Y*
- —
OCTW vs. PSMR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OCTW AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Oct ETF | 4.65% | 9.68% | 8.67% | 17.57% | 0.54% | 4.61% |
PSMR Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF | 7.68% | 6.74% | 11.99% | 16.85% | -4.11% | 7.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between OCTW and PSMR is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2021 | 0.80 |
The correlation between OCTW and PSMR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.
OCTW vs. PSMR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
OCTW
PSMR
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
OCTW
PSMR
Financial Services
OCTW
PSMR
Communication Services
OCTW
PSMR
Consumer Cyclical
OCTW
PSMR
Healthcare
OCTW
PSMR
Industrials
OCTW
PSMR
Consumer Defensive
OCTW
PSMR
Energy
OCTW
PSMR
Utilities
OCTW
PSMR
Real Estate
OCTW
PSMR
Basic Materials
OCTW
PSMR
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OCTW vs. PSMR — Risk / Return Rank
OCTW
PSMR
OCTW vs. PSMR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Oct ETF (OCTW) and Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF (PSMR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| OCTW | PSMR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.67 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.53 | 1.96 | -0.43 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.43 | 15.03 | -11.60 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.68 | 73.58 | -55.90 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| OCTW | PSMR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.56 | 4.23 | -1.67 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.41 | 1.01 | +0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.48 | 1.05 | +0.43 |
Drawdowns
OCTW vs. PSMR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OCTW drawdown since its inception was -8.38%, smaller than the maximum PSMR drawdown of -11.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OCTW and PSMR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OCTW | PSMR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.38% | -11.78% | +3.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.65% | -0.99% | -2.66% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.38% | -11.78% | +3.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -8.38% | -11.78% | +3.40% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.11% | -0.15% | +0.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.82% | -1.67% | +0.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.71% | 0.20% | +0.51% |
Volatility
OCTW vs. PSMR - Volatility Comparison
AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Oct ETF (OCTW) and Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF (PSMR) have volatilities of 0.73% and 0.71%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OCTW | PSMR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.73% | 0.71% | +0.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.81% | 2.48% | +1.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.92% | 3.53% | +1.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.29% | 8.48% | -2.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.14% | 8.41% | -2.27% |
OCTW vs. PSMR - Expense Ratio Comparison
OCTW has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than PSMR's 0.61% expense ratio.
Dividends
OCTW vs. PSMR - Dividend Comparison
Neither OCTW nor PSMR has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
OCTW and PSMR have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
OCTW has higher volatility (0.73%) compared to PSMR (0.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OCTW dropped -8.38% vs PSMR's -11.78%.
On 5-year performance, OCTW leads with 8.85% vs 8.52% for PSMR. On fees, PSMR is cheaper at 0.61% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, OCTW has performed better with a 8.85% return vs 8.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PSMR is cheaper with a 0.61% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for OCTW.
OCTW and PSMR have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Allianz and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for OCTW and 0.61% for PSMR.
PSMR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.23 vs 2.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for OCTW and PSMR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer