OCTW vs. FLJJ

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

OCTW (AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Oct ETF) and FLJJ (Allianzim U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Floor5 Jan/Jul ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - OCTW is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust, while FLJJ is a Options Trading fund actively managed by Allianz. OCTW is passively managed, while FLJJ is actively managed. Over the past year, OCTW returned 10.70% vs 13.53% for FLJJ. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.74% expense ratio.

Performance

OCTW vs. FLJJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Oct ETF (OCTW) and Allianzim U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Floor5 Jan/Jul ETF (FLJJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OCTW achieves a 4.28% return, which is significantly lower than FLJJ's 5.23% return.

OCTW

• 1D: 0.05%
• 1M: -0.05%
• YTD: 4.28%
• 6M: 3.91%
• 1Y: 10.70%
• 3Y*: 10.38%
• 5Y*: 8.71%
• 10Y*: —

FLJJ

• 1D: 0.15%
• 1M: 0.53%
• YTD: 5.23%
• 6M: 5.33%
• 1Y: 13.53%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OCTW vs. FLJJ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
OCTW AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Oct ETF	4.28%	9.68%	7.42%
FLJJ Allianzim U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Floor5 Jan/Jul ETF	5.23%	11.35%	14.40%

Correlation

The correlation between OCTW and FLJJ is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2024	0.87

The correlation between OCTW and FLJJ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

OCTW vs. FLJJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OCTW

OCTW Risk / Return Rank: 79
OCTW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
OCTW Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
OCTW Omega Ratio Rank: 85
OCTW Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
OCTW Martin Ratio Rank: 83

FLJJ

FLJJ Risk / Return Rank: 90
FLJJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
FLJJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
FLJJ Omega Ratio Rank: 94
FLJJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
FLJJ Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OCTW vs. FLJJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Oct ETF (OCTW) and Allianzim U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Floor5 Jan/Jul ETF (FLJJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	OCTW	FLJJ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.19	2.93	-0.74
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.23	4.44	-1.21
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.45	1.60	-0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.94	3.52	-0.58
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.94	18.61	-3.67

OCTW vs. FLJJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OCTW Sharpe Ratio is 2.19, which is comparable to the FLJJ Sharpe Ratio of 2.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OCTW and FLJJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

OCTW vs. FLJJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OCTW drawdown since its inception was -8.38%, which is greater than FLJJ's maximum drawdown of -6.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OCTW and FLJJ.

Drawdown Indicators

	OCTW	FLJJ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-8.38%	-6.91%	-1.47%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.65%	-3.86%	+0.21%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-8.38%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-8.38%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.52%	-0.15%	-0.37%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.81%	-0.77%	-0.04%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.72%	0.73%	-0.01%

Volatility

OCTW vs. FLJJ - Volatility Comparison

AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Oct ETF (OCTW) and Allianzim U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Floor5 Jan/Jul ETF (FLJJ) have volatilities of 1.30% and 1.26%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	OCTW	FLJJ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.30%	1.26%	+0.04%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.88%	3.76%	+0.12%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.90%	4.64%	+0.26%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.31%	6.18%	+0.13%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.13%	6.18%	-0.05%

OCTW vs. FLJJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both OCTW and FLJJ have an expense ratio of 0.74%.

Dividends

OCTW vs. FLJJ - Dividend Comparison

Neither OCTW nor FLJJ has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both OCTW and FLJJ in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, OCTW and FLJJ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, OCTW or FLJJ?

OCTW has higher volatility (1.30%) compared to FLJJ (1.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OCTW dropped -8.38% vs FLJJ's -6.91%.

Which ETF is better, OCTW or FLJJ?

On 1-year performance, FLJJ leads with 13.53% vs 10.70% for OCTW. Both ETFs have the same 0.74% expense ratio. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, OCTW or FLJJ?

Over the 1-year period, FLJJ has performed better with a 13.53% return vs 10.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, OCTW or FLJJ?

OCTW and FLJJ have the same expense ratio: 0.74% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, OCTW or FLJJ?

OCTW and FLJJ have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between OCTW and FLJJ?

OCTW is categorized as Defined Outcome, while FLJJ is Options Trading.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FLJJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.93 vs 2.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.