OCTW vs. FLJJ

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Oct ETF (OCTW) and Allianzim U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Floor5 Jan/Jul ETF (FLJJ).

OCTW and FLJJ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. OCTW is a passively managed fund by Allianz that tracks the performance of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust. It was launched on Sep 30, 2020. FLJJ is an actively managed fund by Allianz. It was launched on Jan 31, 2024.

Performance

OCTW vs. FLJJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Oct ETF (OCTW) and Allianzim U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Floor5 Jan/Jul ETF (FLJJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

OCTW vs. FLJJ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
OCTW AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Oct ETF	-0.95%	9.68%	7.21%
FLJJ Allianzim U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Floor5 Jan/Jul ETF	-1.50%	11.35%	14.19%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OCTW achieves a -0.95% return, which is significantly higher than FLJJ's -1.50% return.

OCTW

• 1D: 0.42%
• 1M: -1.55%
• YTD: -0.95%
• 6M: 0.51%
• 1Y: 9.74%
• 3Y*: 9.86%
• 5Y*: 7.86%
• 10Y*: —

FLJJ

• 1D: 0.51%
• 1M: -2.07%
• YTD: -1.50%
• 6M: 0.79%
• 1Y: 12.11%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OCTW vs. FLJJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both OCTW and FLJJ have an expense ratio of 0.74%.

OCTW

AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Oct ETF

FLJJ

Allianzim U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Floor5 Jan/Jul ETF

Return for Risk

OCTW vs. FLJJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OCTW

OCTW Risk / Return Rank: 69
OCTW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
OCTW Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
OCTW Omega Ratio Rank: 75
OCTW Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
OCTW Martin Ratio Rank: 77

FLJJ

FLJJ Risk / Return Rank: 89
FLJJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
FLJJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
FLJJ Omega Ratio Rank: 90
FLJJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
FLJJ Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OCTW vs. FLJJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Oct ETF (OCTW) and Allianzim U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Floor5 Jan/Jul ETF (FLJJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	OCTW	FLJJ	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.22	1.89	-0.68
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.80	2.80	-1.00
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.40	-0.10
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.70	3.15	-1.45
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	9.08	13.06	-3.98
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

OCTW vs. FLJJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OCTW Sharpe Ratio is 1.22, which is lower than the FLJJ Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OCTW and FLJJ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	OCTW	FLJJ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.22	1.89	-0.68
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.26	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.34	1.75	-0.41

Correlation

The correlation between OCTW and FLJJ is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

OCTW vs. FLJJ - Dividend Comparison

Neither OCTW nor FLJJ has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

OCTW vs. FLJJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OCTW drawdown since its inception was -8.38%, which is greater than FLJJ's maximum drawdown of -6.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OCTW and FLJJ.

Drawdown Indicators

	OCTW	FLJJ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-8.38%	-6.91%	-1.47%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.86%	-3.86%	-2.00%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-8.38%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.93%	-2.45%	+0.52%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.84%	-0.82%	-0.02%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.10%	0.93%	+0.17%

Volatility

OCTW vs. FLJJ - Volatility Comparison

AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Oct ETF (OCTW) has a higher volatility of 2.45% compared to Allianzim U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Floor5 Jan/Jul ETF (FLJJ) at 2.16%. This indicates that OCTW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLJJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	OCTW	FLJJ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.45%	2.16%	+0.29%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.09%	3.49%	+0.60%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.04%	6.42%	+1.62%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.25%	6.31%	-0.06%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.19%	6.31%	-0.12%