PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OCTW vs. FLJJ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

OCTW vs. FLJJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Oct ETF (OCTW) and Allianzim U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Floor5 Jan/Jul ETF (FLJJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OCTW achieves a 4.65% return, which is significantly lower than FLJJ's 4.98% return.


OCTW

1D
-0.11%
1M
1.67%
YTD
4.65%
6M
5.17%
1Y
12.50%
3Y*
10.88%
5Y*
8.85%
10Y*

FLJJ

1D
-0.00%
1M
1.88%
YTD
4.98%
6M
5.80%
1Y
15.29%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OCTW vs. FLJJ - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between OCTW and FLJJ is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2024

0.86

The correlation between OCTW and FLJJ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

OCTW vs. FLJJ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
OCTW
FLJJ

Technology

36.2%
36.2%

Financial Services

11.9%
11.9%

Communication Services

10.9%
10.9%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
10.1%

Healthcare

8.4%
8.4%

Industrials

8.1%
8.1%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
4.9%

Energy

3.5%
3.5%

Utilities

2.3%
2.3%

Real Estate

1.9%
1.9%

Basic Materials

1.8%
1.8%

Technology

OCTW
36.2%
FLJJ
36.2%

Financial Services

OCTW
11.9%
FLJJ
11.9%

Communication Services

OCTW
10.9%
FLJJ
10.9%

Consumer Cyclical

OCTW
10.1%
FLJJ
10.1%

Healthcare

OCTW
8.4%
FLJJ
8.4%

Industrials

OCTW
8.1%
FLJJ
8.1%

Consumer Defensive

OCTW
4.9%
FLJJ
4.9%

Energy

OCTW
3.5%
FLJJ
3.5%

Utilities

OCTW
2.3%
FLJJ
2.3%

Real Estate

OCTW
1.9%
FLJJ
1.9%

Basic Materials

OCTW
1.8%
FLJJ
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OCTW vs. FLJJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OCTW
OCTW Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
OCTW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OCTW Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
OCTW Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
OCTW Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
OCTW Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

FLJJ
FLJJ Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
FLJJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLJJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLJJ Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
FLJJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLJJ Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OCTW vs. FLJJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Oct ETF (OCTW) and Allianzim U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Floor5 Jan/Jul ETF (FLJJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


OCTWFLJJDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.88

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.53

1.65

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.43

3.98

-0.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.68

20.87

-3.19

OCTW vs. FLJJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OCTW Sharpe Ratio is 2.56, which is comparable to the FLJJ Sharpe Ratio of 3.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OCTW and FLJJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


OCTWFLJJDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.56

3.02

-0.47

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.41

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.48

2.14

-0.65

Drawdowns

OCTW vs. FLJJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OCTW drawdown since its inception was -8.38%, which is greater than FLJJ's maximum drawdown of -6.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OCTW and FLJJ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OCTWFLJJDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.38%

-6.91%

-1.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.65%

-3.86%

+0.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-8.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.11%

-0.05%

-0.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.82%

-0.78%

-0.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.71%

0.73%

-0.02%

Volatility

OCTW vs. FLJJ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Oct ETF (OCTW) is 0.73%, while Allianzim U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Floor5 Jan/Jul ETF (FLJJ) has a volatility of 0.86%. This indicates that OCTW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLJJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OCTWFLJJDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.73%

0.86%

-0.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.81%

3.59%

+0.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.92%

5.10%

-0.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.29%

6.21%

+0.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.14%

6.21%

-0.07%

OCTW vs. FLJJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both OCTW and FLJJ have an expense ratio of 0.74%.


Dividends

OCTW vs. FLJJ - Dividend Comparison

Neither OCTW nor FLJJ has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, OCTW and FLJJ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FLJJ has higher volatility (0.86%) compared to OCTW (0.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OCTW dropped -8.38% vs FLJJ's -6.91%.

On 1-year performance, FLJJ leads with 15.29% vs 12.50% for OCTW. Both ETFs have the same 0.74% expense ratio. On volatility, OCTW has been the lower-risk option at 0.73%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, FLJJ has performed better with a 15.29% return vs 12.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

OCTW and FLJJ have the same expense ratio: 0.74% per year.

OCTW and FLJJ have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

OCTW is categorized as Defined Outcome, while FLJJ is Options Trading.

FLJJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.02 vs 2.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OCTW and FLJJ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer