PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OCTW vs. COMT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

OCTW vs. COMT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Oct ETF (OCTW) and iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF (COMT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OCTW achieves a 4.65% return, which is significantly lower than COMT's 39.67% return.


OCTW

1D
-0.11%
1M
1.67%
YTD
4.65%
6M
5.17%
1Y
12.50%
3Y*
10.88%
5Y*
8.85%
10Y*

COMT

1D
0.78%
1M
-4.35%
YTD
39.67%
6M
39.06%
1Y
47.51%
3Y*
16.86%
5Y*
13.50%
10Y*
9.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OCTW vs. COMT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
OCTW
AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Oct ETF
4.65%9.68%8.67%17.57%0.54%6.48%4.11%
COMT
iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF
39.67%6.07%5.96%-6.56%19.45%36.88%8.21%

Correlation

The correlation between OCTW and COMT is -0.20, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.04

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2020

0.08

The correlation between OCTW and COMT shifts across timeframes, from -0.20 (1 year) to 0.08 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

OCTW vs. COMT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
OCTW
COMT

Technology

36.2%

-

Financial Services

11.9%
100.0%

Communication Services

10.9%

-

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%

-

Healthcare

8.4%

-

Industrials

8.1%

-

Consumer Defensive

4.9%

-

Energy

3.5%

-

Utilities

2.3%

-

Real Estate

1.9%

-

Basic Materials

1.8%

-

Technology

OCTW
36.2%
COMT

-

Financial Services

OCTW
11.9%
COMT
100.0%

Communication Services

OCTW
10.9%
COMT

-

Consumer Cyclical

OCTW
10.1%
COMT

-

Healthcare

OCTW
8.4%
COMT

-

Industrials

OCTW
8.1%
COMT

-

Consumer Defensive

OCTW
4.9%
COMT

-

Energy

OCTW
3.5%
COMT

-

Utilities

OCTW
2.3%
COMT

-

Real Estate

OCTW
1.9%
COMT

-

Basic Materials

OCTW
1.8%
COMT

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OCTW vs. COMT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OCTW
OCTW Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
OCTW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OCTW Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
OCTW Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
OCTW Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
OCTW Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

COMT
COMT Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
COMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
COMT Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
COMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
COMT Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OCTW vs. COMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Oct ETF (OCTW) and iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF (COMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


OCTWCOMTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.56

2.24

+0.31

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.79

2.88

+0.91

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.53

1.40

+0.13

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.43

5.95

-2.52

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

17.68

14.11

+3.57

OCTW vs. COMT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OCTW Sharpe Ratio is 2.56, which is comparable to the COMT Sharpe Ratio of 2.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OCTW and COMT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


OCTWCOMTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.56

2.24

+0.31

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.41

0.64

+0.77

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.48

0.20

+1.28

Drawdowns

OCTW vs. COMT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OCTW drawdown since its inception was -8.38%, smaller than the maximum COMT drawdown of -51.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OCTW and COMT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OCTWCOMTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.38%

-51.89%

+43.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.65%

-8.02%

+4.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.38%

-13.31%

+4.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-8.38%

-29.00%

+20.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.11%

-4.82%

+4.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.82%

-24.07%

+23.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.71%

3.38%

-2.67%

Volatility

OCTW vs. COMT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Oct ETF (OCTW) is 0.73%, while iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF (COMT) has a volatility of 7.37%. This indicates that OCTW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OCTWCOMTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.73%

7.37%

-6.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.81%

18.80%

-14.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.92%

21.29%

-16.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.29%

21.06%

-14.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.14%

18.89%

-12.75%

OCTW vs. COMT - Expense Ratio Comparison

OCTW has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than COMT's 0.48% expense ratio.


Dividends

OCTW vs. COMT - Dividend Comparison

OCTW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while COMT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.54%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
COMT
iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF
5.54%7.74%4.90%5.19%29.79%17.79%0.36%2.61%11.65%5.16%0.52%1.44%
OCTW
AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Oct ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


OCTW and COMT have a correlation of -0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

COMT has higher volatility (7.37%) compared to OCTW (0.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OCTW dropped -8.38% vs COMT's -51.89%.

On 5-year performance, COMT leads with 13.50% vs 8.85% for OCTW. On fees, COMT is cheaper at 0.48% per year. On volatility, OCTW has been the lower-risk option at 0.73%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, COMT has performed better with a 13.50% return vs 8.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

COMT is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for OCTW.

COMT has the higher dividend yield at 5.54%, compared with 0.00% for OCTW.

OCTW is categorized as Defined Outcome, while COMT is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Allianz and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for OCTW and 0.48% for COMT.

OCTW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.56 vs 2.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OCTW and COMT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer