OCTT vs. OCTW

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

OCTT (AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Oct ETF) and OCTW (AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Oct ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - OCTT is a Options Trading fund actively managed by Allianz, while OCTW is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust. OCTT is actively managed, while OCTW is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, OCTT returned 10.41%/yr vs 8.85%/yr for OCTW. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.74% expense ratio.

Performance

OCTT vs. OCTW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Oct ETF (OCTT) and AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Oct ETF (OCTW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OCTT achieves a 6.89% return, which is significantly higher than OCTW's 4.65% return.

OCTT

• 1D: -0.24%
• 1M: 2.77%
• YTD: 6.89%
• 6M: 7.45%
• 1Y: 19.21%
• 3Y*: 14.15%
• 5Y*: 10.41%
• 10Y*: —

OCTW

• 1D: -0.11%
• 1M: 1.67%
• YTD: 4.65%
• 6M: 5.17%
• 1Y: 12.50%
• 3Y*: 10.88%
• 5Y*: 8.85%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OCTT vs. OCTW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
OCTT AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Oct ETF	6.89%	13.86%	11.87%	20.92%	-7.10%	13.55%	7.16%
OCTW AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Oct ETF	4.65%	9.68%	8.67%	17.57%	0.54%	6.48%	4.11%

Correlation

The correlation between OCTT and OCTW is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.96
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.92
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2020	0.92

The correlation between OCTT and OCTW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

OCTT vs. OCTW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OCTT

OCTT Risk / Return Rank: 78
OCTT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
OCTT Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
OCTT Omega Ratio Rank: 82
OCTT Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
OCTT Martin Ratio Rank: 82

OCTW

OCTW Risk / Return Rank: 81
OCTW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
OCTW Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
OCTW Omega Ratio Rank: 86
OCTW Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
OCTW Martin Ratio Rank: 85

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OCTT vs. OCTW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Oct ETF (OCTT) and AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Oct ETF (OCTW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	OCTT	OCTW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.49	2.56	-0.07
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.54	3.79	-0.25
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.49	1.53	-0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.32	3.43	-0.12
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.48	17.68	-1.20
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

OCTT vs. OCTW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OCTT Sharpe Ratio is 2.49, which is comparable to the OCTW Sharpe Ratio of 2.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OCTT and OCTW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	OCTT	OCTW	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.49	2.56	-0.07
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.00	1.41	-0.41
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.14	1.48	-0.34

Drawdowns

OCTT vs. OCTW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OCTT drawdown since its inception was -13.49%, which is greater than OCTW's maximum drawdown of -8.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OCTT and OCTW.

Drawdown Indicators

	OCTT	OCTW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.49%	-8.38%	-5.11%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.81%	-3.65%	-2.16%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.04%	-8.38%	-4.66%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-13.49%	-8.38%	-5.11%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.24%	-0.11%	-0.13%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.03%	-0.82%	-1.21%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.17%	0.71%	+0.46%

Volatility

OCTT vs. OCTW - Volatility Comparison

AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Oct ETF (OCTT) has a higher volatility of 1.27% compared to AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Oct ETF (OCTW) at 0.73%. This indicates that OCTT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OCTW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	OCTT	OCTW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.27%	0.73%	+0.54%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.94%	3.81%	+2.13%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.77%	4.92%	+2.85%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.43%	6.29%	+4.14%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.22%	6.14%	+4.08%

OCTT vs. OCTW - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both OCTT and OCTW have an expense ratio of 0.74%.

Dividends

OCTT vs. OCTW - Dividend Comparison

Neither OCTT nor OCTW has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both OCTT and OCTW in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.96, OCTT and OCTW move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, OCTT or OCTW?

OCTT has higher volatility (1.27%) compared to OCTW (0.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OCTT dropped -13.49% vs OCTW's -8.38%.

Which ETF is better, OCTT or OCTW?

On 5-year performance, OCTT leads with 10.41% vs 8.85% for OCTW. Both ETFs have the same 0.74% expense ratio. On volatility, OCTW has been the lower-risk option at 0.73%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, OCTT or OCTW?

Over the 5-year period, OCTT has performed better with a 10.41% return vs 8.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, OCTT or OCTW?

OCTT and OCTW have the same expense ratio: 0.74% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, OCTT or OCTW?

OCTT and OCTW have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between OCTT and OCTW?

OCTT is categorized as Options Trading, while OCTW is Defined Outcome.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

OCTW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.56 vs 2.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.