OCTT vs. IBID

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

OCTT (AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Oct ETF) and IBID (iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - OCTT is a Options Trading fund actively managed by Allianz, while IBID is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the ICE 2027 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index. OCTT is actively managed, while IBID is passively managed. Over the past year, OCTT returned 17.56% vs 3.92% for IBID. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions. OCTT charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for IBID.

Performance

OCTT vs. IBID - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Oct ETF (OCTT) and iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF (IBID). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OCTT achieves a 6.08% return, which is significantly higher than IBID's 1.94% return.

OCTT

• 1D: -0.67%
• 1M: -0.05%
• YTD: 6.08%
• 6M: 5.68%
• 1Y: 17.56%
• 3Y*: 13.29%
• 5Y*: 10.13%
• 10Y*: —

IBID

• 1D: -0.05%
• 1M: -0.25%
• YTD: 1.94%
• 6M: 2.03%
• 1Y: 3.92%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OCTT vs. IBID - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
OCTT AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Oct ETF	6.08%	13.86%	11.87%	3.28%
IBID iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF	1.94%	5.66%	4.71%	2.61%

Correlation

The correlation between OCTT and IBID is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.12
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2023	-0.01

The correlation between OCTT and IBID shifts across timeframes, from -0.12 (1 year) to -0.01 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

OCTT vs. IBID — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OCTT

OCTT Risk / Return Rank: 77
OCTT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
OCTT Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
OCTT Omega Ratio Rank: 80
OCTT Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
OCTT Martin Ratio Rank: 82

IBID

IBID Risk / Return Rank: 95
IBID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
IBID Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
IBID Omega Ratio Rank: 95
IBID Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
IBID Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OCTT vs. IBID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Oct ETF (OCTT) and iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF (IBID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	OCTT	IBID	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.23	3.19	-0.96
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.16	5.38	-2.23
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	1.72	-0.28
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.03	7.20	-4.17
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.84	29.14	-14.30

OCTT vs. IBID - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OCTT Sharpe Ratio is 2.23, which is lower than the IBID Sharpe Ratio of 3.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OCTT and IBID, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

OCTT vs. IBID - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OCTT drawdown since its inception was -13.49%, which is greater than IBID's maximum drawdown of -1.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OCTT and IBID.

Drawdown Indicators

	OCTT	IBID	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.49%	-1.28%	-12.21%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.81%	-0.55%	-5.26%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.04%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-13.49%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.00%	-0.55%	-0.45%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.02%	-0.22%	-1.80%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.19%	0.13%	+1.06%

Volatility

OCTT vs. IBID - Volatility Comparison

AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Oct ETF (OCTT) has a higher volatility of 2.38% compared to iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF (IBID) at 0.35%. This indicates that OCTT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBID based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	OCTT	IBID	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.38%	0.35%	+2.03%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.20%	0.86%	+5.34%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.93%	1.23%	+6.70%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.48%	2.24%	+8.24%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.21%	2.24%	+7.97%

OCTT vs. IBID - Expense Ratio Comparison

OCTT has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than IBID's 0.10% expense ratio.

Dividends

OCTT vs. IBID - Dividend Comparison

OCTT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IBID's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.68%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
IBID iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF	3.68%	4.43%	4.24%	0.81%
OCTT AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Oct ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both OCTT and IBID in my portfolio?

OCTT and IBID have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, OCTT or IBID?

OCTT has higher volatility (2.38%) compared to IBID (0.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OCTT dropped -13.49% vs IBID's -1.28%.

Which ETF is better, OCTT or IBID?

On 1-year performance, OCTT leads with 17.56% vs 3.92% for IBID. On fees, IBID is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IBID has been the lower-risk option at 0.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, OCTT or IBID?

Over the 1-year period, OCTT has performed better with a 17.56% return vs 3.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, OCTT or IBID?

IBID is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for OCTT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, OCTT or IBID?

IBID has the higher dividend yield at 3.68%, compared with 0.00% for OCTT.

What is the main difference between OCTT and IBID?

OCTT is categorized as Options Trading, while IBID is Inflation-Protected Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Allianz and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for OCTT and 0.10% for IBID.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IBID currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.19 vs 2.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.