PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OCTT vs. DRLL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

OCTT vs. DRLL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Oct ETF (OCTT) and Strive U.S. Energy ETF (DRLL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OCTT achieves a 9.31% return, which is significantly lower than DRLL's 33.53% return.


OCTT

1D
0.67%
1M
2.09%
6M
8.47%
YTD
9.31%
1Y
16.58%
3Y*
13.56%
5Y*
10.65%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
11.61%

DRLL

1D
-1.05%
1M
11.55%
6M
17.30%
YTD
33.53%
1Y
41.89%
3Y*
12.03%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
13.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$455.44K$502.20K$532.52K
$102.89K$799.31K$534.20K

OCTT vs. DRLL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
OCTT
AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Oct ETF
9.31%13.86%11.87%20.92%-0.95%
DRLL
Strive U.S. Energy ETF
33.53%7.74%0.02%-1.84%15.52%

Correlation

The correlation between OCTT and DRLL is -0.18, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 9, 2022

0.23

The correlation between OCTT and DRLL shifts across timeframes, from -0.18 (1 year) to 0.23 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OCTT vs. DRLL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

OCTT
OCTT Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
OCTT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OCTT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
OCTT Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
OCTT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
OCTT Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

DRLL
DRLL Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
DRLL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DRLL Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
DRLL Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
DRLL Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
DRLL Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

OCTT vs. DRLL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Oct ETF (OCTT) and Strive U.S. Energy ETF (DRLL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


OCTTDRLLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.30

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.86

2.48

+0.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.84

6.29

+7.56

OCTT vs. DRLL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OCTT Sharpe Ratio is 2.08, which is comparable to the DRLL Sharpe Ratio of 1.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OCTT and DRLL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

OCTT vs. DRLL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OCTT drawdown since its inception was -13.49%, smaller than the maximum DRLL drawdown of -23.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OCTT and DRLL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OCTTDRLLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.49%

-23.73%

+10.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.81%

-16.99%

+11.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.04%

-23.73%

+10.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-6.51%

+6.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.99%

-8.14%

+6.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.20%

6.68%

-5.48%

Volatility

OCTT vs. DRLL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Oct ETF (OCTT) is 2.29%, while Strive U.S. Energy ETF (DRLL) has a volatility of 7.12%. This indicates that OCTT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DRLL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OCTTDRLLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.29%

7.12%

-4.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.34%

18.68%

-12.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.06%

22.97%

-14.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.54%

23.79%

-13.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.16%

23.79%

-13.63%

OCTT vs. DRLL - Expense Ratio Comparison

OCTT has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than DRLL's 0.41% expense ratio.


Dividends

OCTT vs. DRLL - Dividend Comparison

OCTT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DRLL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.27%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
DRLL
Strive U.S. Energy ETF
2.27%2.99%3.00%3.01%1.18%
OCTT
AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Oct ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


OCTT and DRLL have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DRLL has higher volatility (7.12%) compared to OCTT (2.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OCTT dropped -13.49% vs DRLL's -23.73%.

On 3-year performance, OCTT leads with 13.56% vs 12.03% for DRLL. On fees, DRLL is cheaper at 0.41% per year. On volatility, OCTT has been the lower-risk option at 2.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, OCTT has performed better with a 13.56% return vs 12.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DRLL is cheaper with a 0.41% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for OCTT.

DRLL has the higher dividend yield at 2.27%, compared with 0.00% for OCTT.

OCTT is categorized as Options Trading, while DRLL is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: Allianz and Strive. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for OCTT and 0.41% for DRLL.

OCTT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs 1.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OCTT and DRLL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer