OCTQ vs. PBAP
OCTQ (Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - October) and PBAP (PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 20 ETF - April) are both Options Trading funds. Both are actively managed. OCTQ charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for PBAP.
Performance
OCTQ vs. PBAP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
OCTQ
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PBAP
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- 1.19%
- YTD
- 6.70%
- 6M
- 7.49%
- 1Y
- 13.30%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
OCTQ vs. PBAP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
OCTQ Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - October | 0.00% |
PBAP PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 20 ETF - April | 6.09% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OCTQ vs. PBAP — Risk / Return Rank
OCTQ
PBAP
OCTQ vs. PBAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - October (OCTQ) and PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 20 ETF - April (PBAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| OCTQ | PBAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 4.29 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 1.45 | — |
Drawdowns
OCTQ vs. PBAP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OCTQ drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum PBAP drawdown of -9.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OCTQ and PBAP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OCTQ | PBAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -9.70% | +9.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -1.17% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.13% | +0.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -0.79% | +0.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.16% | — |
Volatility
OCTQ vs. PBAP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OCTQ | PBAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.59% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 2.00% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.00% | 3.12% | -3.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.00% | 7.10% | -7.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.00% | 7.10% | -7.10% |
OCTQ vs. PBAP - Expense Ratio Comparison
OCTQ has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than PBAP's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
OCTQ vs. PBAP - Dividend Comparison
Neither OCTQ nor PBAP has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, PBAP is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PBAP is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for OCTQ.
OCTQ and PBAP have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Innovator and PGIM. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for OCTQ and 0.50% for PBAP.
Find the right allocation for OCTQ and PBAP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer