OCTQ vs. CAOS
OCTQ (Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - October) and CAOS (Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF) are both Options Trading funds. Both are actively managed. OCTQ charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.63%/yr for CAOS.
Performance
OCTQ vs. CAOS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
OCTQ
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CAOS
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- -0.09%
- YTD
- 0.82%
- 6M
- 0.69%
- 1Y
- 1.88%
- 3Y*
- 4.26%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
OCTQ vs. CAOS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
OCTQ Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - October | 0.00% |
CAOS Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF | 0.18% |
OCTQ vs. CAOS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
OCTQ
CAOS
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
OCTQ
CAOS
Financial Services
OCTQ
CAOS
Consumer Cyclical
OCTQ
CAOS
Communication Services
OCTQ
CAOS
Healthcare
OCTQ
CAOS
Industrials
OCTQ
CAOS
Consumer Defensive
OCTQ
CAOS
Energy
OCTQ
CAOS
Utilities
OCTQ
CAOS
Real Estate
OCTQ
CAOS
Basic Materials
OCTQ
CAOS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OCTQ vs. CAOS — Risk / Return Rank
OCTQ
CAOS
OCTQ vs. CAOS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - October (OCTQ) and Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF (CAOS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| OCTQ | CAOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.24 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 1.21 | — |
Drawdowns
OCTQ vs. CAOS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OCTQ drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum CAOS drawdown of -3.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OCTQ and CAOS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OCTQ | CAOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -3.60% | +3.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.76% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -3.60% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.07% | +1.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -0.90% | +0.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.30% | — |
Volatility
OCTQ vs. CAOS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OCTQ | CAOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.26% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 1.03% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.00% | 1.52% | -1.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.00% | 4.26% | -4.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.00% | 4.26% | -4.26% |
OCTQ vs. CAOS - Expense Ratio Comparison
OCTQ has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than CAOS's 0.63% expense ratio.
Dividends
OCTQ vs. CAOS - Dividend Comparison
Neither OCTQ nor CAOS has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, CAOS is cheaper at 0.63% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CAOS is cheaper with a 0.63% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for OCTQ.
OCTQ and CAOS have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Alpha Architect. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for OCTQ and 0.63% for CAOS.
Find the right allocation for OCTQ and CAOS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer