PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OCTQ vs. CAOS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

OCTQ vs. CAOS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - October (OCTQ) and Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF (CAOS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


OCTQ

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CAOS

1D
0.12%
1M
-0.09%
YTD
0.82%
6M
0.69%
1Y
1.88%
3Y*
4.26%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OCTQ vs. CAOS - Yearly Performance Comparison


OCTQ vs. CAOS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
OCTQ
CAOS

Technology

35.3%
33.1%

Financial Services

13.4%
12.4%

Consumer Cyclical

10.6%
10.0%

Communication Services

9.9%
10.4%

Healthcare

8.8%
9.6%

Industrials

7.8%
8.5%

Consumer Defensive

5.2%
5.4%

Energy

3.0%
4.1%

Utilities

2.5%
2.6%

Real Estate

2.0%
2.0%

Basic Materials

1.6%
1.9%

Technology

OCTQ
35.3%
CAOS
33.1%

Financial Services

OCTQ
13.4%
CAOS
12.4%

Consumer Cyclical

OCTQ
10.6%
CAOS
10.0%

Communication Services

OCTQ
9.9%
CAOS
10.4%

Healthcare

OCTQ
8.8%
CAOS
9.6%

Industrials

OCTQ
7.8%
CAOS
8.5%

Consumer Defensive

OCTQ
5.2%
CAOS
5.4%

Energy

OCTQ
3.0%
CAOS
4.1%

Utilities

OCTQ
2.5%
CAOS
2.6%

Real Estate

OCTQ
2.0%
CAOS
2.0%

Basic Materials

OCTQ
1.6%
CAOS
1.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OCTQ vs. CAOS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OCTQ

CAOS
CAOS Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
CAOS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CAOS Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
CAOS Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
CAOS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
CAOS Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OCTQ vs. CAOS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - October (OCTQ) and Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF (CAOS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

OCTQ vs. CAOS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


OCTQCAOSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.21

Drawdowns

OCTQ vs. CAOS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OCTQ drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum CAOS drawdown of -3.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OCTQ and CAOS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OCTQCAOSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

0.00%

-3.60%

+3.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.07%

+1.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

0.00%

-0.90%

+0.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.30%

Volatility

OCTQ vs. CAOS - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OCTQCAOSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.00%

1.52%

-1.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.00%

4.26%

-4.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.00%

4.26%

-4.26%

OCTQ vs. CAOS - Expense Ratio Comparison

OCTQ has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than CAOS's 0.63% expense ratio.


Dividends

OCTQ vs. CAOS - Dividend Comparison

Neither OCTQ nor CAOS has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


On fees, CAOS is cheaper at 0.63% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CAOS is cheaper with a 0.63% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for OCTQ.

OCTQ and CAOS have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Alpha Architect. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for OCTQ and 0.63% for CAOS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OCTQ and CAOS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer