OCTQ vs. BAPR

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

OCTQ (Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - October) and BAPR (Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April) are both exchange-traded funds - OCTQ is a Options Trading fund actively managed by Innovator, while BAPR is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the Cboe S&P 500 Buffer Protect Index April. OCTQ is actively managed, while BAPR is passively managed. Both charge a 0.79% expense ratio.

Performance

OCTQ vs. BAPR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - October (OCTQ) and Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April (BAPR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

OCTQ

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BAPR

• 1D: -0.23%
• 1M: 2.21%
• YTD: 10.81%
• 6M: 11.74%
• 1Y: 20.12%
• 3Y*: 15.31%
• 5Y*: 11.17%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OCTQ vs. BAPR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
OCTQ Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - October	0.00%
BAPR Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April	9.94%

OCTQ vs. BAPR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	OCTQ	BAPR
Technology	35.3%	36.2%
Financial Services	13.4%	11.9%
Consumer Cyclical	10.6%	10.1%
Communication Services	9.9%	10.9%
Healthcare	8.8%	8.4%
Industrials	7.8%	8.1%
Consumer Defensive	5.2%	4.9%
Energy	3.0%	3.5%
Utilities	2.5%	2.3%
Real Estate	2.0%	1.9%
Basic Materials	1.6%	1.8%

Return for Risk

OCTQ vs. BAPR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BAPR

BAPR Risk / Return Rank: 96
BAPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
BAPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
BAPR Omega Ratio Rank: 97
BAPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
BAPR Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OCTQ vs. BAPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - October (OCTQ) and Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April (BAPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	OCTQ	BAPR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	3.59	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.98	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	0.84	—

Drawdowns

OCTQ vs. BAPR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OCTQ drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum BAPR drawdown of -23.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OCTQ and BAPR.

Drawdown Indicators

	OCTQ	BAPR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	0.00%	-23.91%	+23.91%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-1.93%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-15.58%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-15.58%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.23%	+0.23%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	0.00%	-2.59%	+2.59%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.35%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	OCTQ	BAPR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	1.06%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	4.53%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.00%	5.64%	-5.64%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	0.00%	11.49%	-11.49%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	0.00%	13.12%	-13.12%

OCTQ vs. BAPR - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both OCTQ and BAPR have an expense ratio of 0.79%.

Dividends

OCTQ vs. BAPR - Dividend Comparison

Neither OCTQ nor BAPR has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, OCTQ or BAPR?

Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, OCTQ or BAPR?

OCTQ and BAPR have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, OCTQ or BAPR?

OCTQ and BAPR have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between OCTQ and BAPR?

OCTQ is categorized as Options Trading, while BAPR is Defined Outcome.