OCTQ vs. ARLU
OCTQ (Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - October) and ARLU (Allianzim U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Apr ETF) are both Options Trading funds. Both are actively managed. OCTQ charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.74%/yr for ARLU.
Performance
OCTQ vs. ARLU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
OCTQ
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ARLU
- 1D
- -0.53%
- 1M
- 4.52%
- YTD
- 6.41%
- 6M
- 6.03%
- 1Y
- 19.35%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
OCTQ vs. ARLU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
OCTQ Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - October | 0.00% |
ARLU Allianzim U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Apr ETF | 5.24% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OCTQ vs. ARLU — Risk / Return Rank
OCTQ
ARLU
OCTQ vs. ARLU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - October (OCTQ) and Allianzim U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Apr ETF (ARLU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| OCTQ | ARLU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.75 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 1.00 | — |
Drawdowns
OCTQ vs. ARLU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OCTQ drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum ARLU drawdown of -15.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OCTQ and ARLU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OCTQ | ARLU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -15.38% | +15.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -9.66% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.53% | +0.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -2.23% | +2.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.15% | — |
Volatility
OCTQ vs. ARLU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OCTQ | ARLU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.63% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.73% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.00% | 11.13% | -11.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.00% | 12.56% | -12.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.00% | 12.56% | -12.56% |
OCTQ vs. ARLU - Expense Ratio Comparison
OCTQ has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than ARLU's 0.74% expense ratio.
Dividends
OCTQ vs. ARLU - Dividend Comparison
Neither OCTQ nor ARLU has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, ARLU is cheaper at 0.74% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ARLU is cheaper with a 0.74% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for OCTQ.
OCTQ and ARLU have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Allianz. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for OCTQ and 0.74% for ARLU.
Find the right allocation for OCTQ and ARLU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer