OCTQ vs. AJAN
OCTQ (Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - October) and AJAN (Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr To January 2026) are both Options Trading funds from Innovator. Both are actively managed. Both charge a 0.79% expense ratio.
Performance
OCTQ vs. AJAN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
OCTQ
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AJAN
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- 0.69%
- YTD
- 1.94%
- 6M
- 2.35%
- 1Y
- 6.01%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
OCTQ vs. AJAN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
OCTQ Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - October | 0.00% |
AJAN Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr To January 2026 | 1.56% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OCTQ vs. AJAN — Risk / Return Rank
OCTQ
AJAN
OCTQ vs. AJAN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - October (OCTQ) and Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr To January 2026 (AJAN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| OCTQ | AJAN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.56 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 1.74 | — |
Drawdowns
OCTQ vs. AJAN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OCTQ drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum AJAN drawdown of -4.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OCTQ and AJAN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OCTQ | AJAN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -4.11% | +4.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -2.24% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.18% | +0.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -0.29% | +0.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.44% | — |
Volatility
OCTQ vs. AJAN - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OCTQ | AJAN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.67% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 2.05% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.00% | 2.36% | -2.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.00% | 3.80% | -3.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.00% | 3.80% | -3.80% |
OCTQ vs. AJAN - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both OCTQ and AJAN have an expense ratio of 0.79%.
Dividends
OCTQ vs. AJAN - Dividend Comparison
Neither OCTQ nor AJAN has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
OCTQ and AJAN have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.
OCTQ and AJAN have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
Find the right allocation for OCTQ and AJAN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer