OCTH vs. XAPR
OCTH (Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - October) and XAPR (FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - April) are both Options Trading funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, OCTH returned 7.08% vs 8.79% for XAPR. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. OCTH charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for XAPR.
Performance
OCTH vs. XAPR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OCTH achieves a 2.88% return, which is significantly lower than XAPR's 3.39% return.
OCTH
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- 0.64%
- YTD
- 2.88%
- 6M
- 3.64%
- 1Y
- 7.08%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XAPR
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- 1.66%
- YTD
- 3.39%
- 6M
- 4.05%
- 1Y
- 8.79%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
OCTH vs. XAPR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
OCTH Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - October | 2.88% | 6.58% | 4.42% |
XAPR FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - April | 3.39% | 12.57% | 8.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between OCTH and XAPR is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 23, 2024 | 0.66 |
The correlation between OCTH and XAPR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OCTH vs. XAPR — Risk / Return Rank
OCTH
XAPR
OCTH vs. XAPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - October (OCTH) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - April (XAPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| OCTH | XAPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.91 | 4.31 | -2.40 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.90 | 7.30 | -4.41 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 2.06 | -0.64 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.11 | 13.37 | -10.26 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.44 | 70.60 | -55.15 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| OCTH | XAPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.91 | 4.31 | -2.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.23 | 1.88 | -0.66 |
Drawdowns
OCTH vs. XAPR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OCTH drawdown since its inception was -7.71%, which is greater than XAPR's maximum drawdown of -6.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OCTH and XAPR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OCTH | XAPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.71% | -6.18% | -1.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.28% | -0.66% | -1.62% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.21% | -0.16% | -0.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.27% | -0.18% | -0.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.46% | 0.12% | +0.34% |
Volatility
OCTH vs. XAPR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - October (OCTH) is 0.38%, while FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - April (XAPR) has a volatility of 0.75%. This indicates that OCTH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XAPR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OCTH | XAPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.38% | 0.75% | -0.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.88% | 1.31% | +1.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.72% | 2.05% | +1.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.06% | 6.18% | -0.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.06% | 6.18% | -0.12% |
OCTH vs. XAPR - Expense Ratio Comparison
OCTH has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than XAPR's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
OCTH vs. XAPR - Dividend Comparison
OCTH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.31%, while XAPR has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
OCTH Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - October | 6.31% | 6.33% | 7.43% | 1.93% |
XAPR FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - April | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
OCTH and XAPR have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XAPR has higher volatility (0.75%) compared to OCTH (0.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OCTH dropped -7.71% vs XAPR's -6.18%.
On 1-year performance, XAPR leads with 8.79% vs 7.08% for OCTH. On fees, OCTH is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, OCTH has been the lower-risk option at 0.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, XAPR has performed better with a 8.79% return vs 7.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
OCTH is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for XAPR.
OCTH has the higher dividend yield at 6.31%, compared with 0.00% for XAPR.
They also come from different issuers: Innovator and FT Vest. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for OCTH and 0.85% for XAPR.
XAPR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.31 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for OCTH and XAPR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer