PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OCTH vs. LAPR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

OCTH vs. LAPR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - October (OCTH) and Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - April (LAPR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OCTH achieves a 2.88% return, which is significantly lower than LAPR's 3.32% return.


OCTH

1D
-0.21%
1M
0.64%
YTD
2.88%
6M
3.64%
1Y
7.08%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

LAPR

1D
-0.04%
1M
0.72%
YTD
3.32%
6M
3.77%
1Y
7.01%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OCTH vs. LAPR - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between OCTH and LAPR is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2024

0.53

The correlation between OCTH and LAPR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.48 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OCTH vs. LAPR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OCTH
OCTH Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
OCTH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OCTH Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
OCTH Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
OCTH Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
OCTH Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

LAPR
LAPR Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
LAPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LAPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
LAPR Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
LAPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
LAPR Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OCTH vs. LAPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - October (OCTH) and Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - April (LAPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


OCTHLAPRDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.91

5.58

-3.66

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.90

12.13

-9.23

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

2.93

-1.51

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.11

29.36

-26.25

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

15.44

144.96

-129.52

OCTH vs. LAPR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OCTH Sharpe Ratio is 1.91, which is lower than the LAPR Sharpe Ratio of 5.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OCTH and LAPR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


OCTHLAPRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.91

5.58

-3.66

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.23

1.97

-0.75

Drawdowns

OCTH vs. LAPR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OCTH drawdown since its inception was -7.71%, which is greater than LAPR's maximum drawdown of -3.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OCTH and LAPR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OCTHLAPRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.71%

-3.81%

-3.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.28%

-0.24%

-2.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.21%

-0.12%

-0.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.27%

-0.11%

-0.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.46%

0.05%

+0.41%

Volatility

OCTH vs. LAPR - Volatility Comparison

Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - October (OCTH) has a higher volatility of 0.38% compared to Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - April (LAPR) at 0.32%. This indicates that OCTH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LAPR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OCTHLAPRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.38%

0.32%

+0.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.88%

1.00%

+1.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.72%

1.27%

+2.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.06%

3.30%

+2.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.06%

3.30%

+2.76%

OCTH vs. LAPR - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both OCTH and LAPR have an expense ratio of 0.79%.


Dividends

OCTH vs. LAPR - Dividend Comparison

OCTH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.31%, more than LAPR's 5.53% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
LAPR
Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - April
5.53%5.40%4.21%0.00%
OCTH
Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - October
6.31%6.33%7.43%1.93%

Frequently Asked Questions


OCTH and LAPR have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

OCTH has higher volatility (0.38%) compared to LAPR (0.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OCTH dropped -7.71% vs LAPR's -3.81%.

On 1-year performance, OCTH leads with 7.08% vs 7.01% for LAPR. Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, OCTH has performed better with a 7.08% return vs 7.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

OCTH and LAPR have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.

OCTH has the higher dividend yield at 6.31%, compared with 5.53% for LAPR.

LAPR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.58 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OCTH and LAPR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer