PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OCTB vs. PQJA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

OCTB vs. PQJA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Aptus October Buffer ETF (OCTB) and PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - January (PQJA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OCTB achieves a 6.18% return, which is significantly lower than PQJA's 8.72% return.


OCTB

1D
-0.17%
1M
2.41%
YTD
6.18%
6M
6.75%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

PQJA

1D
-0.09%
1M
3.19%
YTD
8.72%
6M
10.05%
1Y
22.65%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OCTB vs. PQJA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
OCTB
Aptus October Buffer ETF
6.18%2.37%
PQJA
PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - January
8.72%4.16%

Correlation

The correlation between OCTB and PQJA is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 15, 2025

0.91

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OCTB vs. PQJA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OCTB

PQJA
PQJA Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
PQJA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PQJA Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
PQJA Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
PQJA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
PQJA Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OCTB vs. PQJA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aptus October Buffer ETF (OCTB) and PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - January (PQJA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

OCTB vs. PQJA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


OCTBPQJADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.77

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.97

1.39

+0.58

Drawdowns

OCTB vs. PQJA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OCTB drawdown since its inception was -4.79%, smaller than the maximum PQJA drawdown of -14.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OCTB and PQJA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OCTBPQJADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.79%

-14.72%

+9.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.17%

-0.09%

-0.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.70%

-1.65%

+0.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.39%

Volatility

OCTB vs. PQJA - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OCTBPQJADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.20%

8.24%

-1.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.20%

13.42%

-6.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.20%

13.42%

-6.22%

OCTB vs. PQJA - Expense Ratio Comparison

OCTB has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than PQJA's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

OCTB vs. PQJA - Dividend Comparison

Neither OCTB nor PQJA has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, OCTB and PQJA move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, OCTB is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

OCTB is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for PQJA.

OCTB and PQJA have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: Aptus Capital Advisors and PGIM. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for OCTB and 0.50% for PQJA.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OCTB and PQJA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer