OCIO vs. DWAT
OCIO (ClearShares OCIO ETF) and DWAT (Arrow DWA Tactical: Macro ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - OCIO is a Diversified Portfolio fund actively managed by ClearShares LLC, while DWAT is a Tactical Allocation fund actively managed by Arrow Funds. Both are actively managed. OCIO charges 0.61%/yr vs 1.83%/yr for DWAT.
Performance
OCIO vs. DWAT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
OCIO
- 1D
- 0.71%
- 1M
- 3.71%
- YTD
- 9.94%
- 6M
- 10.68%
- 1Y
- 22.20%
- 3Y*
- 14.20%
- 5Y*
- 7.68%
- 10Y*
- —
DWAT
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
OCIO vs. DWAT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
OCIO ClearShares OCIO ETF | 6.94% |
DWAT Arrow DWA Tactical: Macro ETF | 0.00% |
OCIO vs. DWAT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
OCIO
DWAT
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
OCIO
DWAT
Financial Services
OCIO
DWAT
Industrials
OCIO
DWAT
Consumer Cyclical
OCIO
DWAT
Healthcare
OCIO
DWAT
Communication Services
OCIO
DWAT
Consumer Defensive
OCIO
DWAT
Energy
OCIO
DWAT
Basic Materials
OCIO
DWAT
Utilities
OCIO
DWAT
Real Estate
OCIO
DWAT
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OCIO vs. DWAT — Risk / Return Rank
OCIO
DWAT
OCIO vs. DWAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ClearShares OCIO ETF (OCIO) and Arrow DWA Tactical: Macro ETF (DWAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| OCIO | DWAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.30 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.27 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.17 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.08 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| OCIO | DWAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.30 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.71 | — | — |
Drawdowns
OCIO vs. DWAT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OCIO drawdown since its inception was -24.21%, which is greater than DWAT's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OCIO and DWAT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OCIO | DWAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.21% | 0.00% | -24.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.98% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.32% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.75% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.44% | 0.00% | -4.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.57% | — | — |
Volatility
OCIO vs. DWAT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OCIO | DWAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.27% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.68% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.69% | 0.00% | +9.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.60% | 0.00% | +10.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.36% | 0.00% | +11.36% |
OCIO vs. DWAT - Expense Ratio Comparison
OCIO has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is lower than DWAT's 1.83% expense ratio.
Dividends
OCIO vs. DWAT - Dividend Comparison
OCIO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.43%, while DWAT has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DWAT Arrow DWA Tactical: Macro ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
OCIO ClearShares OCIO ETF | 9.43% | 10.27% | 1.87% | 2.32% | 3.21% | 2.83% | 2.90% | 2.22% | 0.01% | 1.68% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, OCIO is cheaper at 0.61% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
OCIO is cheaper with a 0.61% expense ratio, compared with 1.83% for DWAT.
OCIO has the higher dividend yield at 9.43%, compared with 0.00% for DWAT.
OCIO is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while DWAT is Tactical Allocation. They also come from different issuers: ClearShares LLC and Arrow Funds. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for OCIO and 1.83% for DWAT.
Find the right allocation for OCIO and DWAT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer