OCDO.L vs. ARES
OCDO.L (Ocado Group plc) and ARES (Ares Management Corporation) are both stocks. OCDO.L operates in Grocery Stores (Consumer Defensive), while ARES operates in Asset Management (Financial Services). Over the past 10 years, OCDO.L returned -2.49%/yr vs 30.63%/yr for ARES. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
OCDO.L vs. ARES - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
OCDO.L is traded in GBp, while ARES is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ARES values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OCDO.L achieves a -11.36% return, which is significantly higher than ARES's -20.41% return. Over the past 10 years, OCDO.L has underperformed ARES with an annualized return of -2.49%, while ARES has yielded a comparatively higher 30.63% annualized return.
OCDO.L
- 1D
- 1.95%
- 1M
- 3.82%
- YTD
- -11.36%
- 6M
- 13.23%
- 1Y
- -17.57%
- 3Y*
- -15.23%
- 5Y*
- -35.57%
- 10Y*
- -2.49%
ARES
- 1D
- -3.11%
- 1M
- 3.37%
- YTD
- -20.41%
- 6M
- -22.20%
- 1Y
- -21.89%
- 3Y*
- 11.99%
- 5Y*
- 22.55%
- 10Y*
- 30.63%
OCDO.L vs. ARES - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OCDO.L Ocado Group plc | -11.36% | -21.93% | -60.14% | 22.96% | -63.24% | -26.63% | 78.81% | 61.90% | 98.94% | 50.36% |
ARES Ares Management Corporation | -20.41% | -12.44% | 55.35% | 70.54% | -2.38% | 79.44% | 33.33% | 102.14% | 0.06% | 1.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between OCDO.L and ARES is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2014 | 0.13 |
Fundamentals
OCDO.L:
£0.08
ARES:
$2.83
OCDO.L:
24.90
ARES:
44.38
OCDO.L:
0.03
ARES:
1.77
OCDO.L:
0.66
ARES:
4.38
OCDO.L:
£2.60B
ARES:
$6.31B
OCDO.L:
-£83.80M
ARES:
$4.46B
OCDO.L:
£296.90M
ARES:
$2.42B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OCDO.L vs. ARES — Risk / Return Rank
OCDO.L
ARES
OCDO.L vs. ARES - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ocado Group plc (OCDO.L) and Ares Management Corporation (ARES). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| OCDO.L | ARES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.56 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 0.93 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.30 | -0.45 | +0.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.43 | -0.90 | +0.47 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| OCDO.L | ARES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.27 | -0.54 | +0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.54 | 0.63 | -1.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.04 | 0.85 | -0.89 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.02 | 0.70 | -0.68 |
Drawdowns
OCDO.L vs. ARES - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OCDO.L drawdown since its inception was -94.05%, which is greater than ARES's maximum drawdown of -53.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OCDO.L and ARES.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OCDO.L | ARES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.05% | -53.32% | -40.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -56.45% | -48.46% | -7.99% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -82.35% | -53.32% | -29.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -91.76% | -53.32% | -38.44% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -94.05% | -53.32% | -40.73% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -92.77% | -38.36% | -54.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -47.85% | -10.79% | -37.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 39.28% | 24.32% | +14.96% |
Volatility
OCDO.L vs. ARES - Volatility Comparison
Ocado Group plc (OCDO.L) has a higher volatility of 16.35% compared to Ares Management Corporation (ARES) at 10.92%. This indicates that OCDO.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ARES based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OCDO.L | ARES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.35% | 10.92% | +5.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 41.78% | 34.87% | +6.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 62.31% | 40.61% | +21.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 65.55% | 36.22% | +29.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 57.87% | 36.21% | +21.66% |
Dividends
OCDO.L vs. ARES - Dividend Comparison
OCDO.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ARES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.42%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARES Ares Management Corporation | 4.42% | 3.29% | 2.10% | 2.59% | 3.57% | 2.31% | 3.40% | 3.59% | 7.50% | 5.65% | 4.32% | 6.81% |
OCDO.L Ocado Group plc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
OCDO.L vs. ARES - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ocado Group plc and Ares Management Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
OCDO.L vs. ARES - Profitability Comparison
OCDO.L - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ocado Group plc reported a gross profit of -108.00M and revenue of 707.70M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -15.3%.
ARES - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ares Management Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.47B and revenue of 1.53B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 96.1%.
OCDO.L - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ocado Group plc reported an operating income of -108.00M and revenue of 707.70M, resulting in an operating margin of -15.3%.
ARES - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ares Management Corporation reported an operating income of 364.95M and revenue of 1.53B, resulting in an operating margin of 23.8%.
OCDO.L - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ocado Group plc reported a net income of -216.60M and revenue of 707.70M, resulting in a net margin of -30.6%.
ARES - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ares Management Corporation reported a net income of 142.59M and revenue of 1.53B, resulting in a net margin of 9.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
OCDO.L and ARES have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for OCDO.L and ARES
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer