PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OBTC vs. IBIC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

OBTC vs. IBIC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Osprey Bitcoin Trust (OBTC) and iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OBTC achieves a -32.48% return, which is significantly lower than IBIC's 2.37% return.


OBTC

1D
-1.11%
1M
-22.02%
YTD
-32.48%
6M
-32.20%
1Y
-39.69%
3Y*
42.23%
5Y*
5.99%
10Y*

IBIC

1D
0.04%
1M
0.08%
YTD
2.37%
6M
2.39%
1Y
4.40%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OBTC vs. IBIC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
OBTC
Osprey Bitcoin Trust
-32.48%-1.87%130.89%70.27%
IBIC
iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF
2.37%4.96%5.25%2.17%

Correlation

The correlation between OBTC and IBIC is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2023

0.01

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OBTC vs. IBIC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OBTC
OBTC Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
OBTC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OBTC Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
OBTC Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
OBTC Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
OBTC Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

IBIC
IBIC Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
IBIC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBIC Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBIC Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
IBIC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBIC Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OBTC vs. IBIC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Osprey Bitcoin Trust (OBTC) and iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


OBTCIBICDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-5.84

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-10.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.86

2.21

-1.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.81

16.49

-17.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.45

57.44

-58.88

OBTC vs. IBIC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OBTC Sharpe Ratio is -0.89, which is lower than the IBIC Sharpe Ratio of 4.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OBTC and IBIC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

OBTC vs. IBIC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OBTC drawdown since its inception was -94.50%, which is greater than IBIC's maximum drawdown of -0.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OBTC and IBIC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OBTCIBICDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-94.50%

-0.90%

-93.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-49.13%

-0.27%

-48.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-49.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-83.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-66.28%

-0.14%

-66.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-69.52%

-0.10%

-69.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

27.45%

0.08%

+27.37%

Volatility

OBTC vs. IBIC - Volatility Comparison

Osprey Bitcoin Trust (OBTC) has a higher volatility of 13.17% compared to iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC) at 0.19%. This indicates that OBTC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBIC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OBTCIBICDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.17%

0.19%

+12.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

34.90%

0.67%

+34.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

44.83%

0.89%

+43.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

57.29%

1.56%

+55.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

76.82%

1.56%

+75.26%

OBTC vs. IBIC - Expense Ratio Comparison

OBTC has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than IBIC's 0.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

OBTC vs. IBIC - Dividend Comparison

OBTC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IBIC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.59%.


PositionTTM202520242023
IBIC
iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF
3.59%4.43%4.65%0.83%
OBTC
Osprey Bitcoin Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


OBTC and IBIC have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

OBTC has higher volatility (13.17%) compared to IBIC (0.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OBTC dropped -94.50% vs IBIC's -0.90%.

On 1-year performance, IBIC leads with 4.40% vs -39.69% for OBTC. On fees, IBIC is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IBIC has been the lower-risk option at 0.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, IBIC has performed better with a 4.40% return vs -39.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IBIC is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for OBTC.

IBIC has the higher dividend yield at 3.59%, compared with 0.00% for OBTC.

OBTC is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while IBIC is Inflation-Protected Bonds. OBTC tracks Bitcoin (BTC), while IBIC tracks ICE 2026 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index. They also come from different issuers: Osprey Funds and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for OBTC and 0.10% for IBIC.

IBIC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.95 vs -0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OBTC and IBIC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer