OBTC vs. ETHW
OBTC (Osprey Bitcoin Trust) and ETHW (Bitwise Ethereum ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. OBTC is passively managed, while ETHW is actively managed. Over the past year, OBTC returned -32.02% vs -38.02% for ETHW. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. OBTC charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for ETHW.
Performance
OBTC vs. ETHW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OBTC achieves a -31.16% return, which is significantly higher than ETHW's -47.11% return.
OBTC
- 1D
- -5.16%
- 1M
- -26.03%
- YTD
- -31.16%
- 6M
- -29.55%
- 1Y
- -32.02%
- 3Y*
- 55.06%
- 5Y*
- 6.73%
- 10Y*
- —
ETHW
- 1D
- -11.42%
- 1M
- -33.08%
- YTD
- -47.11%
- 6M
- -48.04%
- 1Y
- -38.02%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
OBTC vs. ETHW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
OBTC Osprey Bitcoin Trust | -31.16% | -1.87% | 39.59% |
ETHW Bitwise Ethereum ETF | -47.11% | -11.26% | -3.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between OBTC and ETHW is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2024 | 0.78 |
The correlation between OBTC and ETHW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OBTC vs. ETHW — Risk / Return Rank
OBTC
ETHW
OBTC vs. ETHW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Osprey Bitcoin Trust (OBTC) and Bitwise Ethereum ETF (ETHW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| OBTC | ETHW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.90 | 0.94 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.67 | -0.56 | -0.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.26 | -1.00 | -0.27 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| OBTC | ETHW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.72 | -0.55 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.12 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.23 | -0.48 | +0.25 |
Drawdowns
OBTC vs. ETHW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OBTC drawdown since its inception was -94.50%, which is greater than ETHW's maximum drawdown of -67.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OBTC and ETHW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OBTC | ETHW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.50% | -67.57% | -26.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -48.14% | -67.57% | +19.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -48.14% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -83.76% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -65.62% | -67.57% | +1.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -69.62% | -32.79% | -36.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 25.40% | 38.19% | -12.79% |
Volatility
OBTC vs. ETHW - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Osprey Bitcoin Trust (OBTC) is 9.93%, while Bitwise Ethereum ETF (ETHW) has a volatility of 14.56%. This indicates that OBTC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ETHW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OBTC | ETHW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.93% | 14.56% | -4.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.48% | 46.46% | -11.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 44.58% | 69.17% | -24.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 58.14% | 72.46% | -14.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 71.55% | 72.46% | -0.91% |
OBTC vs. ETHW - Expense Ratio Comparison
OBTC has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than ETHW's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
OBTC vs. ETHW - Dividend Comparison
Neither OBTC nor ETHW has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
OBTC and ETHW have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ETHW has higher volatility (14.56%) compared to OBTC (9.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OBTC dropped -94.50% vs ETHW's -67.57%.
On 1-year performance, OBTC leads with -32.02% vs -38.02% for ETHW. On fees, ETHW is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, OBTC has been the lower-risk option at 9.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, OBTC has performed better with a -32.02% return vs -38.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ETHW is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for OBTC.
OBTC and ETHW have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Osprey Funds and Bitwise. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for OBTC and 0.20% for ETHW.
ETHW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.55 vs -0.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for OBTC and ETHW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer