OBTC vs. ETHV
OBTC (Osprey Bitcoin Trust) and ETHV (VanEck Ethereum ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds - OBTC tracks the Bitcoin (BTC) while ETHV tracks the MarketVector Ethereum Benchmark Rate. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, OBTC returned -32.02% vs -37.87% for ETHV. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. OBTC charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for ETHV.
Performance
OBTC vs. ETHV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OBTC achieves a -31.16% return, which is significantly higher than ETHV's -47.05% return.
OBTC
- 1D
- -5.16%
- 1M
- -26.03%
- YTD
- -31.16%
- 6M
- -29.55%
- 1Y
- -32.02%
- 3Y*
- 55.06%
- 5Y*
- 6.73%
- 10Y*
- —
ETHV
- 1D
- -11.40%
- 1M
- -32.96%
- YTD
- -47.05%
- 6M
- -48.03%
- 1Y
- -37.87%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
OBTC vs. ETHV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
OBTC Osprey Bitcoin Trust | -31.16% | -1.87% | 39.59% |
ETHV VanEck Ethereum ETF | -47.05% | -11.02% | -3.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between OBTC and ETHV is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2024 | 0.78 |
The correlation between OBTC and ETHV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OBTC vs. ETHV — Risk / Return Rank
OBTC
ETHV
OBTC vs. ETHV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Osprey Bitcoin Trust (OBTC) and VanEck Ethereum ETF (ETHV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| OBTC | ETHV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.90 | 0.95 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.67 | -0.56 | -0.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.26 | -0.99 | -0.27 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| OBTC | ETHV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.72 | -0.55 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.12 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.23 | -0.48 | +0.25 |
Drawdowns
OBTC vs. ETHV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OBTC drawdown since its inception was -94.50%, which is greater than ETHV's maximum drawdown of -67.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OBTC and ETHV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OBTC | ETHV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.50% | -67.54% | -26.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -48.14% | -67.54% | +19.40% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -48.14% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -83.76% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -65.62% | -67.54% | +1.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -69.62% | -32.78% | -36.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 25.40% | 38.18% | -12.78% |
Volatility
OBTC vs. ETHV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Osprey Bitcoin Trust (OBTC) is 9.93%, while VanEck Ethereum ETF (ETHV) has a volatility of 14.46%. This indicates that OBTC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ETHV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OBTC | ETHV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.93% | 14.46% | -4.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.48% | 46.45% | -11.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 44.58% | 69.27% | -24.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 58.14% | 72.63% | -14.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 71.55% | 72.63% | -1.08% |
OBTC vs. ETHV - Expense Ratio Comparison
OBTC has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than ETHV's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
OBTC vs. ETHV - Dividend Comparison
Neither OBTC nor ETHV has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
OBTC and ETHV have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ETHV has higher volatility (14.46%) compared to OBTC (9.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OBTC dropped -94.50% vs ETHV's -67.54%.
On 1-year performance, OBTC leads with -32.02% vs -37.87% for ETHV. On fees, ETHV is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, OBTC has been the lower-risk option at 9.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, OBTC has performed better with a -32.02% return vs -37.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ETHV is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for OBTC.
OBTC and ETHV have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
OBTC tracks Bitcoin (BTC), while ETHV tracks MarketVector Ethereum Benchmark Rate. They also come from different issuers: Osprey Funds and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for OBTC and 0.20% for ETHV.
ETHV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.55 vs -0.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for OBTC and ETHV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer