OBTC vs. BFOC

Last updated Jul 16, 2026

OBTC (Osprey Bitcoin Trust) and BFOC (FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - October) are both exchange-traded funds - OBTC is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Bitcoin (BTC), while BFOC is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by First Trust. OBTC is passively managed, while BFOC is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. OBTC charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for BFOC.

Performance

OBTC vs. BFOC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Osprey Bitcoin Trust (OBTC) and FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - October (BFOC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OBTC achieves a -25.85% return, which is significantly lower than BFOC's -7.09% return.

OBTC

• 1D: 0.94%
• 1M: -2.35%
• 6M: -33.28%
• YTD: -25.85%
• 1Y: -38.12%
• 3Y*: 41.06%
• 5Y*: 8.59%
• 10Y*: —

BFOC

• 1D: -0.44%
• 1M: -0.41%
• 6M: -10.22%
• YTD: -7.09%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OBTC vs. BFOC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
OBTC Osprey Bitcoin Trust	-25.85%	-18.08%
BFOC FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - October	-7.09%	-9.75%

Correlation

The correlation between OBTC and BFOC is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2025	0.85

Return for Risk

OBTC vs. BFOC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OBTC

OBTC Risk / Return Rank: 3
OBTC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
OBTC Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
OBTC Omega Ratio Rank: 3
OBTC Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
OBTC Martin Ratio Rank: 3

BFOC

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OBTC vs. BFOC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Osprey Bitcoin Trust (OBTC) and FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - October (BFOC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	OBTC	BFOC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.85	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.16	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.87	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.77	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.30	—	—

Drawdowns

OBTC vs. BFOC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OBTC drawdown since its inception was -94.50%, which is greater than BFOC's maximum drawdown of -18.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OBTC and BFOC.

Drawdown Indicators

	OBTC	BFOC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-94.50%	-18.41%	-76.09%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-49.62%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-49.62%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-83.76%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-62.96%	-17.93%	-45.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-69.47%	-13.23%	-56.24%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	29.42%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	OBTC	BFOC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.77%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	35.27%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	45.00%	11.94%	+33.06%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	57.18%	11.94%	+45.24%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	76.54%	11.94%	+64.60%

OBTC vs. BFOC - Expense Ratio Comparison

OBTC has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than BFOC's 0.90% expense ratio.

Dividends

OBTC vs. BFOC - Dividend Comparison

Neither OBTC nor BFOC has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both OBTC and BFOC in my portfolio?

OBTC and BFOC have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, OBTC or BFOC?

On fees, OBTC is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, OBTC or BFOC?

OBTC is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for BFOC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, OBTC or BFOC?

OBTC and BFOC have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between OBTC and BFOC?

OBTC is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while BFOC is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: Osprey Funds and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for OBTC and 0.90% for BFOC.