PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OBOR vs. KMLM
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

OBOR vs. KMLM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KraneShares MSCI One Belt One Road Index ETF (OBOR) and KFA Mount Lucas Index Strategy ETF (KMLM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

OBOR vs. KMLM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
OBOR
KraneShares MSCI One Belt One Road Index ETF
3.18%27.86%8.55%-7.91%-21.96%17.06%5.79%
KMLM
KFA Mount Lucas Index Strategy ETF
8.67%-2.98%-1.69%-5.66%30.61%7.04%5.40%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OBOR achieves a 3.18% return, which is significantly lower than KMLM's 8.67% return.


OBOR

1D
0.76%
1M
-8.96%
YTD
3.18%
6M
9.93%
1Y
29.26%
3Y*
10.30%
5Y*
2.10%
10Y*

KMLM

1D
-0.28%
1M
4.21%
YTD
8.67%
6M
10.01%
1Y
8.60%
3Y*
0.44%
5Y*
5.63%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


OBOR vs. KMLM - Expense Ratio Comparison

OBOR has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than KMLM's 0.90% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

OBOR vs. KMLM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OBOR
OBOR Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
OBOR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OBOR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
OBOR Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
OBOR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
OBOR Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

KMLM
KMLM Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
KMLM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KMLM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
KMLM Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
KMLM Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
KMLM Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OBOR vs. KMLM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares MSCI One Belt One Road Index ETF (OBOR) and KFA Mount Lucas Index Strategy ETF (KMLM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


OBORKMLMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.85

0.88

+0.97

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.42

1.27

+1.15

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.16

+0.21

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.79

1.13

+1.66

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.05

3.31

+6.74

OBOR vs. KMLM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OBOR Sharpe Ratio is 1.85, which is higher than the KMLM Sharpe Ratio of 0.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OBOR and KMLM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


OBORKMLMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.85

0.88

+0.97

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

0.39

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.21

0.49

-0.28

Correlation

The correlation between OBOR and KMLM is -0.04. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Dividends

OBOR vs. KMLM - Dividend Comparison

OBOR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.88%, less than KMLM's 4.62% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
OBOR
KraneShares MSCI One Belt One Road Index ETF
1.88%1.94%3.87%3.40%4.75%3.26%2.04%4.33%0.02%0.10%
KMLM
KFA Mount Lucas Index Strategy ETF
4.62%5.02%0.82%0.00%13.22%6.94%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

OBOR vs. KMLM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OBOR drawdown since its inception was -41.54%, which is greater than KMLM's maximum drawdown of -27.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OBOR and KMLM.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


OBORKMLMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.54%

-27.47%

-14.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.47%

-6.73%

-3.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.00%

-27.47%

-6.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.96%

-15.27%

+6.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.16%

-12.73%

-3.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.91%

2.41%

+0.50%

Volatility

OBOR vs. KMLM - Volatility Comparison

KraneShares MSCI One Belt One Road Index ETF (OBOR) has a higher volatility of 6.59% compared to KFA Mount Lucas Index Strategy ETF (KMLM) at 4.05%. This indicates that OBOR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KMLM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


OBORKMLMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.59%

4.05%

+2.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.08%

7.22%

+4.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.86%

9.84%

+6.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.78%

14.57%

+1.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.46%

14.67%

+3.79%