OBOR vs. DEM
OBOR (KraneShares MSCI One Belt One Road Index ETF) and DEM (WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds - OBOR tracks the MSCI Global China Infrastructure Exposure while DEM tracks the WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity income Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, OBOR returned 0.84%/yr vs 9.57%/yr for DEM. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. OBOR charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.63%/yr for DEM.
Performance
OBOR vs. DEM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OBOR achieves a 3.11% return, which is significantly lower than DEM's 19.97% return.
OBOR
- 1D
- -1.11%
- 1M
- -0.75%
- YTD
- 3.11%
- 6M
- 6.70%
- 1Y
- 23.10%
- 3Y*
- 11.59%
- 5Y*
- 0.84%
- 10Y*
- —
DEM
- 1D
- -1.19%
- 1M
- 6.63%
- YTD
- 19.97%
- 6M
- 20.75%
- 1Y
- 32.23%
- 3Y*
- 19.32%
- 5Y*
- 9.57%
- 10Y*
- 10.45%
OBOR vs. DEM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OBOR KraneShares MSCI One Belt One Road Index ETF | 3.11% | 27.86% | 8.55% | -7.91% | -21.96% | 17.06% | 13.47% | 16.75% | -15.36% | 1.74% |
DEM WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund | 19.97% | 21.29% | 4.46% | 20.93% | -10.43% | 11.49% | -5.84% | 19.84% | -7.69% | 5.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between OBOR and DEM is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 11, 2017 | 0.81 |
The correlation between OBOR and DEM shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (1 year) to 0.81 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
OBOR vs. DEM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
OBOR
DEM
Basic Materials
Industrials
Financial Services
Utilities
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Basic Materials
OBOR
DEM
Industrials
OBOR
DEM
Financial Services
OBOR
DEM
Utilities
OBOR
DEM
Energy
OBOR
DEM
Consumer Cyclical
OBOR
DEM
Healthcare
OBOR
DEM
Communication Services
OBOR
DEM
Consumer Defensive
OBOR
-
DEM
Real Estate
OBOR
-
DEM
Technology
OBOR
-
DEM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OBOR vs. DEM — Risk / Return Rank
OBOR
DEM
OBOR vs. DEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares MSCI One Belt One Road Index ETF (OBOR) and WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund (DEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| OBOR | DEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.44 | 2.38 | -0.94 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.96 | 3.28 | -1.32 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.43 | -0.17 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.22 | 4.10 | -1.89 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.62 | 14.52 | -8.91 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| OBOR | DEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.44 | 2.38 | -0.94 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.05 | 0.63 | -0.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.58 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.20 | 0.22 | -0.02 |
Drawdowns
OBOR vs. DEM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OBOR drawdown since its inception was -41.54%, smaller than the maximum DEM drawdown of -51.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OBOR and DEM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OBOR | DEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.54% | -51.85% | +10.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.47% | -7.89% | -2.58% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.06% | -15.64% | -2.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.00% | -27.18% | -6.82% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.79% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.03% | -1.19% | -7.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.97% | -12.90% | -3.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.12% | 2.22% | +1.90% |
Volatility
OBOR vs. DEM - Volatility Comparison
KraneShares MSCI One Belt One Road Index ETF (OBOR) has a higher volatility of 6.38% compared to WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund (DEM) at 5.64%. This indicates that OBOR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OBOR | DEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.38% | 5.64% | +0.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.84% | 11.33% | +2.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.10% | 13.59% | +2.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.05% | 15.33% | +0.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.52% | 17.96% | +0.56% |
OBOR vs. DEM - Expense Ratio Comparison
OBOR has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than DEM's 0.63% expense ratio.
Dividends
OBOR vs. DEM - Dividend Comparison
OBOR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.88%, less than DEM's 3.76% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DEM WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund | 3.76% | 4.88% | 5.24% | 5.49% | 8.62% | 5.87% | 4.21% | 4.78% | 4.47% | 3.67% | 3.63% | 5.21% |
OBOR KraneShares MSCI One Belt One Road Index ETF | 1.88% | 1.94% | 3.87% | 3.40% | 4.75% | 3.26% | 2.04% | 4.33% | 0.02% | 0.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
OBOR and DEM have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
OBOR has higher volatility (6.38%) compared to DEM (5.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OBOR dropped -41.54% vs DEM's -51.85%.
On 5-year performance, DEM leads with 9.57% vs 0.84% for OBOR. On fees, DEM is cheaper at 0.63% per year. On volatility, DEM has been the lower-risk option at 5.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, DEM has performed better with a 9.57% return vs 0.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DEM is cheaper with a 0.63% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for OBOR.
DEM has the higher dividend yield at 3.76%, compared with 1.88% for OBOR.
OBOR tracks MSCI Global China Infrastructure Exposure, while DEM tracks WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity income Index. They also come from different issuers: CICC and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for OBOR and 0.63% for DEM.
DEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for OBOR and DEM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer