PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OBOR vs. DEM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

OBOR vs. DEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KraneShares MSCI One Belt One Road Index ETF (OBOR) and WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund (DEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OBOR achieves a 3.11% return, which is significantly lower than DEM's 19.97% return.


OBOR

1D
-1.11%
1M
-0.75%
YTD
3.11%
6M
6.70%
1Y
23.10%
3Y*
11.59%
5Y*
0.84%
10Y*

DEM

1D
-1.19%
1M
6.63%
YTD
19.97%
6M
20.75%
1Y
32.23%
3Y*
19.32%
5Y*
9.57%
10Y*
10.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OBOR vs. DEM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
OBOR
KraneShares MSCI One Belt One Road Index ETF
3.11%27.86%8.55%-7.91%-21.96%17.06%13.47%16.75%-15.36%1.74%
DEM
WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund
19.97%21.29%4.46%20.93%-10.43%11.49%-5.84%19.84%-7.69%5.17%

Correlation

The correlation between OBOR and DEM is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 11, 2017

0.81

The correlation between OBOR and DEM shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (1 year) to 0.81 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

OBOR vs. DEM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
OBOR
DEM

Basic Materials

26.6%
3.5%

Industrials

25.1%
9.5%

Financial Services

23.1%
21.9%

Utilities

14.1%
3.0%

Energy

8.5%
6.1%

Consumer Cyclical

0.4%
5.0%

Healthcare

0.2%
0.6%

Communication Services

0.2%
3.0%

Consumer Defensive

-

5.8%

Real Estate

-

3.0%

Technology

-

17.4%

Basic Materials

OBOR
26.6%
DEM
3.5%

Industrials

OBOR
25.1%
DEM
9.5%

Financial Services

OBOR
23.1%
DEM
21.9%

Utilities

OBOR
14.1%
DEM
3.0%

Energy

OBOR
8.5%
DEM
6.1%

Consumer Cyclical

OBOR
0.4%
DEM
5.0%

Healthcare

OBOR
0.2%
DEM
0.6%

Communication Services

OBOR
0.2%
DEM
3.0%

Consumer Defensive

OBOR

-

DEM
5.8%

Real Estate

OBOR

-

DEM
3.0%

Technology

OBOR

-

DEM
17.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OBOR vs. DEM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OBOR
OBOR Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
OBOR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OBOR Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
OBOR Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
OBOR Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
OBOR Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

DEM
DEM Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
DEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
DEM Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
DEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
DEM Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OBOR vs. DEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares MSCI One Belt One Road Index ETF (OBOR) and WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund (DEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


OBORDEMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.44

2.38

-0.94

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.96

3.28

-1.32

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.43

-0.17

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.22

4.10

-1.89

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.62

14.52

-8.91

OBOR vs. DEM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OBOR Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is lower than the DEM Sharpe Ratio of 2.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OBOR and DEM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


OBORDEMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.44

2.38

-0.94

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.05

0.63

-0.58

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.20

0.22

-0.02

Drawdowns

OBOR vs. DEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OBOR drawdown since its inception was -41.54%, smaller than the maximum DEM drawdown of -51.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OBOR and DEM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OBORDEMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.54%

-51.85%

+10.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.47%

-7.89%

-2.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.06%

-15.64%

-2.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.00%

-27.18%

-6.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.03%

-1.19%

-7.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.97%

-12.90%

-3.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.12%

2.22%

+1.90%

Volatility

OBOR vs. DEM - Volatility Comparison

KraneShares MSCI One Belt One Road Index ETF (OBOR) has a higher volatility of 6.38% compared to WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund (DEM) at 5.64%. This indicates that OBOR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OBORDEMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.38%

5.64%

+0.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.84%

11.33%

+2.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.10%

13.59%

+2.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.05%

15.33%

+0.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.52%

17.96%

+0.56%

OBOR vs. DEM - Expense Ratio Comparison

OBOR has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than DEM's 0.63% expense ratio.


Dividends

OBOR vs. DEM - Dividend Comparison

OBOR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.88%, less than DEM's 3.76% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DEM
WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund
3.76%4.88%5.24%5.49%8.62%5.87%4.21%4.78%4.47%3.67%3.63%5.21%
OBOR
KraneShares MSCI One Belt One Road Index ETF
1.88%1.94%3.87%3.40%4.75%3.26%2.04%4.33%0.02%0.10%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


OBOR and DEM have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

OBOR has higher volatility (6.38%) compared to DEM (5.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OBOR dropped -41.54% vs DEM's -51.85%.

On 5-year performance, DEM leads with 9.57% vs 0.84% for OBOR. On fees, DEM is cheaper at 0.63% per year. On volatility, DEM has been the lower-risk option at 5.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, DEM has performed better with a 9.57% return vs 0.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DEM is cheaper with a 0.63% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for OBOR.

DEM has the higher dividend yield at 3.76%, compared with 1.88% for OBOR.

OBOR tracks MSCI Global China Infrastructure Exposure, while DEM tracks WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity income Index. They also come from different issuers: CICC and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for OBOR and 0.63% for DEM.

DEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OBOR and DEM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer