OBMCX vs. NESGX
Compare and contrast key facts about Oberweis Micro Cap Fund (OBMCX) and Needham Small Cap Growth Fund (NESGX).
OBMCX is managed by Oberweis. It was launched on Dec 29, 1995. NESGX is managed by Needham. It was launched on May 22, 2002.
Performance
OBMCX vs. NESGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
OBMCX vs. NESGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OBMCX Oberweis Micro Cap Fund | 13.51% | 14.70% | 22.82% | 18.87% | -10.57% | 53.20% | 29.91% | 21.94% | -12.04% | 27.90% |
NESGX Needham Small Cap Growth Fund | 15.34% | 10.50% | 12.76% | 5.68% | -30.21% | 10.59% | 71.90% | 54.42% | -5.43% | 11.96% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OBMCX achieves a 13.51% return, which is significantly lower than NESGX's 15.34% return. Over the past 10 years, OBMCX has outperformed NESGX with an annualized return of 19.20%, while NESGX has yielded a comparatively lower 14.90% annualized return.
OBMCX
- 1D
- 4.17%
- 1M
- -4.11%
- YTD
- 13.51%
- 6M
- 11.94%
- 1Y
- 49.08%
- 3Y*
- 20.34%
- 5Y*
- 14.90%
- 10Y*
- 19.20%
NESGX
- 1D
- 5.32%
- 1M
- -3.72%
- YTD
- 15.34%
- 6M
- 15.45%
- 1Y
- 55.17%
- 3Y*
- 12.89%
- 5Y*
- 1.14%
- 10Y*
- 14.90%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
OBMCX vs. NESGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
OBMCX has a 1.48% expense ratio, which is lower than NESGX's 1.85% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
OBMCX vs. NESGX — Risk / Return Rank
OBMCX
NESGX
OBMCX vs. NESGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Oberweis Micro Cap Fund (OBMCX) and Needham Small Cap Growth Fund (NESGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| OBMCX | NESGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.82 | 1.58 | +0.23 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.42 | 2.17 | +0.25 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.29 | +0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.82 | 3.11 | +0.72 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.69 | 10.44 | +3.25 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| OBMCX | NESGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.82 | 1.58 | +0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 | 0.04 | +0.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.75 | 0.58 | +0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 0.52 | -0.11 |
Correlation
The correlation between OBMCX and NESGX is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
OBMCX vs. NESGX - Dividend Comparison
OBMCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.24%, while NESGX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OBMCX Oberweis Micro Cap Fund | 1.24% | 1.41% | 2.53% | 0.00% | 1.37% | 24.35% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 19.67% | 11.76% | 0.05% | 3.07% |
NESGX Needham Small Cap Growth Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 4.16% | 25.09% | 13.69% | 8.43% | 22.26% | 8.94% | 6.67% | 2.52% |
Drawdowns
OBMCX vs. NESGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OBMCX drawdown since its inception was -68.24%, which is greater than NESGX's maximum drawdown of -50.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OBMCX and NESGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| OBMCX | NESGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.24% | -50.29% | -17.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.68% | -17.27% | +4.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.11% | -50.05% | +21.94% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -50.04% | -50.29% | +0.25% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.04% | -4.31% | -0.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.51% | -11.74% | -4.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.54% | 5.14% | -1.60% |
Volatility
OBMCX vs. NESGX - Volatility Comparison
Oberweis Micro Cap Fund (OBMCX) and Needham Small Cap Growth Fund (NESGX) have volatilities of 12.02% and 12.14%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| OBMCX | NESGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.02% | 12.14% | -0.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.34% | 23.43% | -4.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.49% | 35.37% | -7.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.14% | 29.13% | -2.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.73% | 25.56% | +0.17% |