PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OAZMX vs. TMMAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

OAZMX vs. TMMAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Oakmark Fund R6 Class (OAZMX) and SEI Institutional Managed Trust Tax-Managed Managed Volatility Fund (TMMAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OAZMX achieves a -0.81% return, which is significantly lower than TMMAX's 5.01% return.


OAZMX

1D
-0.79%
1M
-0.36%
YTD
-0.81%
6M
2.24%
1Y
11.77%
3Y*
15.35%
5Y*
9.65%
10Y*

TMMAX

1D
0.06%
1M
1.81%
YTD
5.01%
6M
5.26%
1Y
10.22%
3Y*
12.88%
5Y*
9.74%
10Y*
10.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OAZMX vs. TMMAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
OAZMX
Oakmark Fund R6 Class
-0.81%14.45%16.33%31.29%-13.16%34.59%1.81%
TMMAX
SEI Institutional Managed Trust Tax-Managed Managed Volatility Fund
5.01%11.03%17.07%7.32%-3.11%24.10%1.41%

Correlation

The correlation between OAZMX and TMMAX is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 24, 2020

0.72

The correlation between OAZMX and TMMAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OAZMX vs. TMMAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OAZMX
OAZMX Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
OAZMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OAZMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
OAZMX Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
OAZMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
OAZMX Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

TMMAX
TMMAX Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
TMMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TMMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
TMMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
TMMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
TMMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OAZMX vs. TMMAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Oakmark Fund R6 Class (OAZMX) and SEI Institutional Managed Trust Tax-Managed Managed Volatility Fund (TMMAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


OAZMXTMMAXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.97

1.28

-0.31

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.47

1.89

-0.42

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.22

-0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.82

1.82

0.00

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.70

6.36

-1.66

OAZMX vs. TMMAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OAZMX Sharpe Ratio is 0.97, which is comparable to the TMMAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OAZMX and TMMAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


OAZMXTMMAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

1.28

-0.31

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

0.51

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.79

0.54

+0.24

Drawdowns

OAZMX vs. TMMAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OAZMX drawdown since its inception was -23.54%, smaller than the maximum TMMAX drawdown of -41.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OAZMX and TMMAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OAZMXTMMAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.54%

-41.50%

+17.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.93%

-5.78%

-1.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.01%

-23.00%

+5.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.54%

-23.00%

-0.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.36%

-6.35%

+2.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.73%

-5.57%

+0.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.68%

1.65%

+1.03%

Volatility

OAZMX vs. TMMAX - Volatility Comparison

Oakmark Fund R6 Class (OAZMX) has a higher volatility of 2.93% compared to SEI Institutional Managed Trust Tax-Managed Managed Volatility Fund (TMMAX) at 2.04%. This indicates that OAZMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TMMAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OAZMXTMMAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.93%

2.04%

+0.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.34%

5.85%

+3.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.01%

8.21%

+4.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.27%

19.07%

-0.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.19%

17.81%

+0.38%

OAZMX vs. TMMAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

OAZMX has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is lower than TMMAX's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

OAZMX vs. TMMAX - Dividend Comparison

OAZMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.21%, less than TMMAX's 24.09% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
OAZMX
Oakmark Fund R6 Class
1.21%1.20%1.38%1.26%1.22%1.72%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TMMAX
SEI Institutional Managed Trust Tax-Managed Managed Volatility Fund
24.09%25.19%23.39%15.23%6.54%4.73%2.15%3.67%4.91%4.10%4.17%5.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


OAZMX and TMMAX have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

OAZMX has higher volatility (2.93%) compared to TMMAX (2.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OAZMX dropped -23.54% vs TMMAX's -41.50%.

TMMAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.28 vs 0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OAZMX and TMMAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer