PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OARK vs. HOCT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

OARK vs. HOCT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax Innovation Option Income Strategy ETF (OARK) and Innovator Premium Income 9 Buffer ETF - October (HOCT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


OARK

1D
-1.57%
1M
0.36%
YTD
6.11%
6M
4.26%
1Y
32.85%
3Y*
14.35%
5Y*
10Y*

HOCT

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OARK vs. HOCT - Yearly Performance Comparison


Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OARK vs. HOCT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OARK
OARK Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
OARK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OARK Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
OARK Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
OARK Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
OARK Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

HOCT
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OARK vs. HOCT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Innovation Option Income Strategy ETF (OARK) and Innovator Premium Income 9 Buffer ETF - October (HOCT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


OARKHOCTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.37

OARK vs. HOCT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


OARKHOCTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

Drawdowns

OARK vs. HOCT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OARK drawdown since its inception was -35.48%, which is greater than HOCT's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OARK and HOCT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OARKHOCTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.48%

0.00%

-35.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.75%

0.00%

-6.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.58%

0.00%

-10.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.77%

Volatility

OARK vs. HOCT - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OARKHOCTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.07%

0.00%

+28.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.84%

0.00%

+30.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.84%

0.00%

+30.84%

OARK vs. HOCT - Expense Ratio Comparison

OARK has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than HOCT's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

OARK vs. HOCT - Dividend Comparison

OARK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 64.29%, while HOCT has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023
HOCT
Innovator Premium Income 9 Buffer ETF - October
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
OARK
YieldMax Innovation Option Income Strategy ETF
64.29%61.86%47.86%45.03%

Frequently Asked Questions


On fees, HOCT is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HOCT is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for OARK.

OARK has the higher dividend yield at 64.29%, compared with 0.00% for HOCT.

They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for OARK and 0.79% for HOCT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OARK and HOCT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer