OANMX vs. GQHPX
OANMX (Oakmark Fund Institutional Class) and GQHPX (GQG Partners US Quality Dividend Income Fund) are both mutual funds - OANMX is a Large Cap Value Equities fund managed by Oakmark, while GQHPX is a Quality Factor fund managed by GQG Partners. Over the past 5 years, OANMX returned 11.39%/yr vs 10.77%/yr for GQHPX. Their 0.62 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. OANMX charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.57%/yr for GQHPX.
Performance
OANMX vs. GQHPX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OANMX achieves a 6.52% return, which is significantly lower than GQHPX's 13.55% return.
OANMX
- 1D
- -0.32%
- 1M
- 3.41%
- 6M
- 6.46%
- YTD
- 6.52%
- 1Y
- 17.10%
- 3Y*
- 14.52%
- 5Y*
- 11.39%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 12.84%
GQHPX
- 1D
- -0.82%
- 1M
- 2.68%
- 6M
- 7.38%
- YTD
- 13.55%
- 1Y
- 16.78%
- 3Y*
- 11.65%
- 5Y*
- 10.77%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 10.80%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
OANMX vs. GQHPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OANMX Oakmark Fund Institutional Class | 6.52% | 14.38% | 16.28% | 31.21% | -13.18% | 7.55% |
GQHPX GQG Partners US Quality Dividend Income Fund | 13.55% | 7.53% | 12.69% | 3.94% | 6.73% | 10.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between OANMX and GQHPX is 0.27, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.27 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.52 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2021 | 0.62 |
Over the past year, the correlation between OANMX and GQHPX has dropped to 0.27 - well below their long-term average of 0.62, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OANMX vs. GQHPX — Risk / Return Rank
OANMX
GQHPX
OANMX vs. GQHPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Oakmark Fund Institutional Class (OANMX) and GQG Partners US Quality Dividend Income Fund (GQHPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| OANMX | GQHPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.48 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.73 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.26 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.98 | 2.53 | -0.55 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.95 | 6.76 | -1.80 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
OANMX vs. GQHPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OANMX drawdown since its inception was -40.08%, which is greater than GQHPX's maximum drawdown of -17.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OANMX and GQHPX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OANMX | GQHPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.08% | -17.26% | -22.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.93% | -6.50% | -0.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.01% | -8.71% | -8.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.55% | -17.26% | -6.29% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.45% | -1.02% | +0.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.52% | -3.34% | -2.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.79% | 2.43% | +0.36% |
Volatility
OANMX vs. GQHPX - Volatility Comparison
Oakmark Fund Institutional Class (OANMX) has a higher volatility of 4.55% compared to GQG Partners US Quality Dividend Income Fund (GQHPX) at 4.32%. This indicates that OANMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GQHPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OANMX | GQHPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.55% | 4.32% | +0.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.77% | 9.14% | +0.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.56% | 11.03% | +2.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.25% | 12.74% | +5.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.56% | 12.74% | +7.82% |
OANMX vs. GQHPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
OANMX has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than GQHPX's 0.57% expense ratio.
Dividends
OANMX vs. GQHPX - Dividend Comparison
OANMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.07%, less than GQHPX's 3.66% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GQHPX GQG Partners US Quality Dividend Income Fund | 3.66% | 2.98% | 3.14% | 2.64% | 3.24% | 0.77% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
OANMX Oakmark Fund Institutional Class | 1.07% | 1.14% | 1.34% | 1.22% | 1.17% | 1.94% | 0.33% | 8.53% | 8.37% | 0.66% |
Frequently Asked Questions
OANMX and GQHPX have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
OANMX has higher volatility (4.55%) compared to GQHPX (4.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OANMX dropped -40.08% vs GQHPX's -17.26%.
GQHPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.49 vs 1.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for OANMX and GQHPX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer