OANMX vs. GQHPX

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Oakmark Fund Institutional Class (OANMX) and GQG Partners US Quality Dividend Income Fund (GQHPX).

OANMX is managed by Oakmark. It was launched on Nov 30, 2016. GQHPX is managed by GQG Partners Inc. It was launched on Jun 29, 2021.

Performance

OANMX vs. GQHPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Oakmark Fund Institutional Class (OANMX) and GQG Partners US Quality Dividend Income Fund (GQHPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

OANMX vs. GQHPX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
OANMX Oakmark Fund Institutional Class	-2.41%	14.38%	16.28%	31.21%	-13.18%	7.05%
GQHPX GQG Partners US Quality Dividend Income Fund	11.80%	7.53%	12.69%	3.94%	6.73%	10.34%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OANMX achieves a -2.41% return, which is significantly lower than GQHPX's 11.80% return.

OANMX

• 1D: 1.76%
• 1M: -3.55%
• YTD: -2.41%
• 6M: 2.42%
• 1Y: 10.38%
• 3Y*: 16.34%
• 5Y*: 11.18%
• 10Y*: —

GQHPX

• 1D: -0.14%
• 1M: -2.01%
• YTD: 11.80%
• 6M: 11.28%
• 1Y: 11.07%
• 3Y*: 12.71%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OANMX vs. GQHPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

OANMX has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than GQHPX's 0.57% expense ratio.

OANMX

Oakmark Fund Institutional Class

GQHPX

GQG Partners US Quality Dividend Income Fund

Return for Risk

OANMX vs. GQHPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OANMX

OANMX Risk / Return Rank: 23
OANMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
OANMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
OANMX Omega Ratio Rank: 20
OANMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
OANMX Martin Ratio Rank: 29

GQHPX

GQHPX Risk / Return Rank: 39
GQHPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
GQHPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
GQHPX Omega Ratio Rank: 35
GQHPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
GQHPX Martin Ratio Rank: 38

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OANMX vs. GQHPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Oakmark Fund Institutional Class (OANMX) and GQG Partners US Quality Dividend Income Fund (GQHPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	OANMX	GQHPX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.55	0.93	-0.38
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.89	1.28	-0.39
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.13	1.18	-0.05
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.84	1.37	-0.53
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	3.34	4.50	-1.16
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

OANMX vs. GQHPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OANMX Sharpe Ratio is 0.55, which is lower than the GQHPX Sharpe Ratio of 0.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OANMX and GQHPX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	OANMX	GQHPX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.55	0.93	-0.38
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.61	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.59	0.90	-0.31

Correlation

The correlation between OANMX and GQHPX is 0.65, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

OANMX vs. GQHPX - Dividend Comparison

OANMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.17%, less than GQHPX's 2.66% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
OANMX Oakmark Fund Institutional Class	1.17%	1.14%	1.34%	1.22%	1.17%	1.94%	0.33%	8.53%	8.37%	0.66%
GQHPX GQG Partners US Quality Dividend Income Fund	2.66%	2.98%	3.14%	2.64%	3.24%	0.77%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

OANMX vs. GQHPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OANMX drawdown since its inception was -40.08%, which is greater than GQHPX's maximum drawdown of -17.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OANMX and GQHPX.

Drawdown Indicators

	OANMX	GQHPX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-40.08%	-17.26%	-22.82%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.46%	-8.17%	-5.29%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.55%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.92%	-2.15%	-2.77%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.62%	-3.36%	-2.26%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.37%	2.64%	+0.73%

Volatility

OANMX vs. GQHPX - Volatility Comparison

Oakmark Fund Institutional Class (OANMX) has a higher volatility of 4.20% compared to GQG Partners US Quality Dividend Income Fund (GQHPX) at 2.66%. This indicates that OANMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GQHPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	OANMX	GQHPX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.20%	2.66%	+1.54%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.34%	6.98%	+3.36%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.77%	11.90%	+6.87%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.36%	12.67%	+5.69%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.79%	12.67%	+8.12%