PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OAKG vs. VOLT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

OAKG vs. VOLT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Oakmark Global Large Cap ETF (OAKG) and Tema Electrification ETF (VOLT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OAKG achieves a -2.91% return, which is significantly lower than VOLT's 44.48% return.


OAKG

1D
1.36%
1M
-0.46%
YTD
-2.91%
6M
-2.85%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

VOLT

1D
2.25%
1M
3.75%
YTD
44.48%
6M
42.09%
1Y
69.19%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OAKG vs. VOLT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
OAKG
Oakmark Global Large Cap ETF
-2.91%1.02%
VOLT
Tema Electrification ETF
44.48%-3.36%

Correlation

The correlation between OAKG and VOLT is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2025

0.37

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OAKG vs. VOLT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OAKG

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


VOLT
VOLT Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
VOLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOLT Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
VOLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOLT Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OAKG vs. VOLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Oakmark Global Large Cap ETF (OAKG) and Tema Electrification ETF (VOLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


OAKGVOLTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

20.29

OAKG vs. VOLT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

OAKG vs. VOLT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OAKG drawdown since its inception was -11.52%, smaller than the maximum VOLT drawdown of -23.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OAKG and VOLT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OAKGVOLTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.52%

-23.40%

+11.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.50%

-0.62%

-5.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.36%

-5.13%

+0.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.42%

Volatility

OAKG vs. VOLT - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OAKGVOLTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.06%

21.82%

-6.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.06%

24.55%

-9.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.06%

24.55%

-9.49%

OAKG vs. VOLT - Expense Ratio Comparison

OAKG has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is lower than VOLT's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

OAKG vs. VOLT - Dividend Comparison

OAKG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.04%, less than VOLT's 0.32% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
OAKG
Oakmark Global Large Cap ETF
0.04%0.04%0.00%
VOLT
Tema Electrification ETF
0.32%0.46%0.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


OAKG and VOLT have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, OAKG is cheaper at 0.62% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

OAKG is cheaper with a 0.62% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for VOLT.

VOLT has the higher dividend yield at 0.32%, compared with 0.04% for OAKG.

They also come from different issuers: Oakmark and Tema. Their fees differ too: 0.62% for OAKG and 0.75% for VOLT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OAKG and VOLT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer