OAKG vs. PJBF

Last updated Jul 18, 2026

OAKG (Oakmark Global Large Cap ETF) and PJBF (PGIM Jennison Better Future ETF) are both Global Equities funds. Both are actively managed. OAKG charges 0.62%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for PJBF.

Performance

OAKG vs. PJBF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Oakmark Global Large Cap ETF (OAKG) and PGIM Jennison Better Future ETF (PJBF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

OAKG

• 1D: -0.76%
• 1M: 2.86%
• 6M: -3.64%
• YTD: -0.63%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PJBF

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OAKG vs. PJBF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
OAKG Oakmark Global Large Cap ETF	-0.43%
PJBF PGIM Jennison Better Future ETF	0.00%

Return for Risk

OAKG vs. PJBF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Oakmark Global Large Cap ETF (OAKG) and PGIM Jennison Better Future ETF (PJBF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Drawdowns

OAKG vs. PJBF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OAKG drawdown since its inception was -11.52%, which is greater than PJBF's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OAKG and PJBF.

Drawdown Indicators

	OAKG	PJBF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-11.52%	0.00%	-11.52%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.30%	0.00%	-4.30%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.36%	0.00%	-4.36%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	OAKG	PJBF	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.77%	0.00%	+14.77%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.77%	0.00%	+14.77%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.77%	0.00%	+14.77%

OAKG vs. PJBF - Expense Ratio Comparison

OAKG has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is higher than PJBF's 0.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

OAKG vs. PJBF - Dividend Comparison

OAKG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.04%, while PJBF has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
OAKG Oakmark Global Large Cap ETF	0.04%	0.04%
PJBF PGIM Jennison Better Future ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, OAKG or PJBF?

On fees, PJBF is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, OAKG or PJBF?

PJBF is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.62% for OAKG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, OAKG or PJBF?

OAKG has the higher dividend yield at 0.04%, compared with 0.00% for PJBF.

What is the main difference between OAKG and PJBF?

They also come from different issuers: Oakmark and PGIM. Their fees differ too: 0.62% for OAKG and 0.59% for PJBF.