OAKCX vs. OANCX
OAKCX (Oakmark Bond Fund Investor Class) and OANCX (Oakmark Bond Fund) are both mutual funds - OAKCX is a Multisector Bonds fund actively managed by Oakmark, while OANCX is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund managed by Oakmark. Over the past 3 years, OAKCX returned 4.90%/yr vs 5.14%/yr for OANCX. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. OAKCX charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.52%/yr for OANCX.
Performance
OAKCX vs. OANCX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OAKCX achieves a 0.79% return, which is significantly lower than OANCX's 0.90% return.
OAKCX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.80%
- YTD
- 0.79%
- 6M
- 0.84%
- 1Y
- 5.01%
- 3Y*
- 4.90%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
OANCX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.82%
- YTD
- 0.90%
- 6M
- 0.97%
- 1Y
- 5.29%
- 3Y*
- 5.14%
- 5Y*
- 0.98%
- 10Y*
- —
OAKCX vs. OANCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OAKCX Oakmark Bond Fund Investor Class | 0.79% | 6.85% | 2.90% | 5.91% | -9.75% |
OANCX Oakmark Bond Fund | 0.90% | 7.05% | 3.19% | 6.12% | -9.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between OAKCX and OANCX is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 28, 2022 | 0.97 |
The correlation between OAKCX and OANCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OAKCX vs. OANCX — Risk / Return Rank
OAKCX
OANCX
OAKCX vs. OANCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Oakmark Bond Fund Investor Class (OAKCX) and Oakmark Bond Fund (OANCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| OAKCX | OANCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.28 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.00 | 2.20 | -0.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.97 | 6.46 | -0.50 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
OAKCX vs. OANCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OAKCX drawdown since its inception was -13.38%, smaller than the maximum OANCX drawdown of -15.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OAKCX and OANCX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OAKCX | OANCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.38% | -15.58% | +2.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.63% | -2.52% | -0.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.56% | -5.50% | -0.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -15.58% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.99% | -0.92% | -0.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.76% | -4.67% | -0.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.88% | 0.86% | +0.02% |
Volatility
OAKCX vs. OANCX - Volatility Comparison
Oakmark Bond Fund Investor Class (OAKCX) and Oakmark Bond Fund (OANCX) have volatilities of 1.10% and 1.10%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OAKCX | OANCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.10% | 1.10% | 0.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.64% | 2.69% | -0.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.48% | 3.59% | -0.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.35% | 5.03% | +0.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.35% | 4.67% | +0.68% |
OAKCX vs. OANCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
OAKCX has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than OANCX's 0.52% expense ratio.
Dividends
OAKCX vs. OANCX - Dividend Comparison
OAKCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.59%, less than OANCX's 4.85% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OAKCX Oakmark Bond Fund Investor Class | 4.59% | 3.57% | 4.37% | 3.62% | 2.77% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
OANCX Oakmark Bond Fund | 4.85% | 3.76% | 4.53% | 3.82% | 2.97% | 3.07% | 1.24% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, OAKCX and OANCX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
OANCX has higher volatility (1.10%) compared to OAKCX (1.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OAKCX dropped -13.38% vs OANCX's -15.58%.
OANCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.55 vs 1.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for OAKCX and OANCX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer