OAKCX vs. JMSIX
OAKCX (Oakmark Bond Fund Investor Class) and JMSIX (JPMorgan Income Fund) are both Multisector Bonds funds. Over the past 3 years, OAKCX returned 4.87%/yr vs 7.08%/yr for JMSIX. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. OAKCX charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for JMSIX.
Performance
OAKCX vs. JMSIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OAKCX achieves a 0.45% return, which is significantly lower than JMSIX's 1.23% return.
OAKCX
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- 0.23%
- YTD
- 0.45%
- 6M
- 0.50%
- 1Y
- 5.25%
- 3Y*
- 4.87%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JMSIX
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- YTD
- 1.23%
- 6M
- 1.73%
- 1Y
- 5.55%
- 3Y*
- 7.08%
- 5Y*
- 2.78%
- 10Y*
- 3.97%
OAKCX vs. JMSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OAKCX Oakmark Bond Fund Investor Class | 0.45% | 6.85% | 2.90% | 5.91% | -9.75% |
JMSIX JPMorgan Income Fund | 1.23% | 7.68% | 7.78% | 6.14% | -7.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between OAKCX and JMSIX is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2022 | 0.75 |
The correlation between OAKCX and JMSIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OAKCX vs. JMSIX — Risk / Return Rank
OAKCX
JMSIX
OAKCX vs. JMSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Oakmark Bond Fund Investor Class (OAKCX) and JPMorgan Income Fund (JMSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| OAKCX | JMSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.62 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.60 | -0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.23 | 3.59 | -1.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.97 | 14.87 | -7.90 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| OAKCX | JMSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.67 | 2.30 | -0.62 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.75 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.03 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.24 | 0.79 | -0.55 |
Drawdowns
OAKCX vs. JMSIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OAKCX drawdown since its inception was -13.38%, smaller than the maximum JMSIX drawdown of -18.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OAKCX and JMSIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OAKCX | JMSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.38% | -18.40% | +5.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.63% | -1.62% | -1.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.56% | -2.31% | -3.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -11.39% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -18.40% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.32% | -0.12% | -1.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.81% | -2.57% | -2.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.84% | 0.39% | +0.45% |
Volatility
OAKCX vs. JMSIX - Volatility Comparison
Oakmark Bond Fund Investor Class (OAKCX) has a higher volatility of 1.24% compared to JPMorgan Income Fund (JMSIX) at 0.82%. This indicates that OAKCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JMSIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OAKCX | JMSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.24% | 0.82% | +0.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.51% | 1.88% | +0.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.51% | 2.54% | +0.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.36% | 3.73% | +1.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.36% | 3.87% | +1.49% |
OAKCX vs. JMSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
OAKCX has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than JMSIX's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
OAKCX vs. JMSIX - Dividend Comparison
OAKCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.60%, less than JMSIX's 6.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JMSIX JPMorgan Income Fund | 6.03% | 5.95% | 5.78% | 4.43% | 4.78% | 4.00% | 4.95% | 5.10% | 5.43% | 5.42% | 0.46% |
OAKCX Oakmark Bond Fund Investor Class | 4.60% | 3.57% | 4.37% | 3.62% | 2.77% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
OAKCX and JMSIX have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
OAKCX has higher volatility (1.24%) compared to JMSIX (0.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OAKCX dropped -13.38% vs JMSIX's -18.40%.
JMSIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 1.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for OAKCX and JMSIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer