OAEM vs. TDEC

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

OAEM (OneAscent Emerging Markets ETF) and TDEC (FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - December) are both exchange-traded funds - OAEM is a Emerging Markets Equities fund actively managed by Oneascent, while TDEC is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets. OAEM is actively managed, while TDEC is passively managed. Over the past year, OAEM returned 43.91% vs 18.15% for TDEC. Their correlation of 0.84 means they have usually moved in the same direction. OAEM charges 1.25%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for TDEC.

Performance

OAEM vs. TDEC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in OneAscent Emerging Markets ETF (OAEM) and FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - December (TDEC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OAEM achieves a 26.54% return, which is significantly higher than TDEC's 8.27% return.

OAEM

• 1D: 0.83%
• 1M: -2.87%
• 6M: 13.83%
• YTD: 26.54%
• 1Y: 43.91%
• 3Y*: 18.13%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 18.43%

TDEC

• 1D: 0.45%
• 1M: 0.74%
• 6M: 4.07%
• YTD: 8.27%
• 1Y: 18.15%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 18.05%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
OAEM OneAscent Emerging Markets ETF	$452.20K	$547.88K	$1.41M
TDEC FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - December	$55.89K	$75.20K	$190.42K

OAEM vs. TDEC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
OAEM OneAscent Emerging Markets ETF	26.54%	26.67%	-0.60%
TDEC FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - December	8.27%	21.39%	-0.75%

Correlation

The correlation between OAEM and TDEC is 0.86, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.86
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 23, 2024	0.84

The correlation between OAEM and TDEC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

OAEM vs. TDEC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

OAEM

OAEM Risk / Return Rank: 70
OAEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
OAEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
OAEM Omega Ratio Rank: 68
OAEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
OAEM Martin Ratio Rank: 74

TDEC

TDEC Risk / Return Rank: 70
TDEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
TDEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
TDEC Omega Ratio Rank: 80
TDEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
TDEC Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

OAEM vs. TDEC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for OneAscent Emerging Markets ETF (OAEM) and FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - December (TDEC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	OAEM	TDEC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.57	1.59	-0.03
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.06	2.22	-0.16
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.34	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.84	2.16	+0.68
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.24	8.78	+0.47

OAEM vs. TDEC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OAEM Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is comparable to the TDEC Sharpe Ratio of 1.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OAEM and TDEC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

OAEM vs. TDEC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OAEM drawdown since its inception was -17.05%, which is greater than TDEC's maximum drawdown of -10.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OAEM and TDEC.

Drawdown Indicators

	OAEM	TDEC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.05%	-10.30%	-6.75%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.09%	-8.16%	-6.93%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.05%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.37%	-1.58%	-8.79%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.98%	-1.12%	-2.86%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.64%	2.01%	+2.63%

Volatility

OAEM vs. TDEC - Volatility Comparison

OneAscent Emerging Markets ETF (OAEM) has a higher volatility of 10.55% compared to FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - December (TDEC) at 3.54%. This indicates that OAEM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TDEC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	OAEM	TDEC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.55%	3.54%	+7.01%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	25.40%	10.30%	+15.10%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	27.41%	11.07%	+16.34%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.93%	11.98%	+8.95%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.93%	11.98%	+8.95%

OAEM vs. TDEC - Expense Ratio Comparison

OAEM has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is higher than TDEC's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

OAEM vs. TDEC - Dividend Comparison

OAEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.61%, while TDEC has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
OAEM OneAscent Emerging Markets ETF	0.61%	0.77%	0.91%	1.63%	0.04%
TDEC FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - December	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both OAEM and TDEC in my portfolio?

OAEM and TDEC have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, OAEM or TDEC?

OAEM has higher volatility (10.55%) compared to TDEC (3.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OAEM dropped -17.05% vs TDEC's -10.30%.

Which ETF is better, OAEM or TDEC?

On 1-year performance, OAEM leads with 43.91% vs 18.15% for TDEC. On fees, TDEC is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, TDEC has been the lower-risk option at 3.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, OAEM or TDEC?

Over the 1-year period, OAEM has performed better with a 43.91% return vs 18.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, OAEM or TDEC?

TDEC is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.25% for OAEM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, OAEM or TDEC?

OAEM has the higher dividend yield at 0.61%, compared with 0.00% for TDEC.

What is the main difference between OAEM and TDEC?

OAEM is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while TDEC is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: Oneascent and FT Vest. Their fees differ too: 1.25% for OAEM and 0.95% for TDEC.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TDEC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.59 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.