PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
O vs. PDI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

O vs. PDI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Realty Income Corporation (O) and PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund (PDI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, O achieves a 13.70% return, which is significantly higher than PDI's -0.81% return. Over the past 10 years, O has underperformed PDI with an annualized return of 4.89%, while PDI has yielded a comparatively higher 7.55% annualized return.


O

1D
1.31%
1M
2.40%
YTD
13.70%
6M
11.57%
1Y
14.25%
3Y*
6.59%
5Y*
3.49%
10Y*
4.89%

PDI

1D
-0.79%
1M
-3.50%
YTD
-0.81%
6M
-0.75%
1Y
0.14%
3Y*
10.87%
5Y*
2.19%
10Y*
7.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

O vs. PDI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
O
Realty Income Corporation
13.70%12.20%-2.11%-4.55%-7.38%23.95%-11.60%21.27%15.94%3.67%
PDI
PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund
-0.81%11.03%17.18%11.99%-16.99%7.81%-9.96%22.23%7.35%18.59%

Correlation

The correlation between O and PDI is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 25, 2012

0.22

The correlation between O and PDI shifts across timeframes, from 0.04 (1 year) to 0.22 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

O:

$1.17

PDI:

$3.86

PE Ratio

O:

53.41

PDI:

4.23

PEG Ratio

O:

4.35

PDI:

0.06

PS Ratio

O:

7.22

PDI:

3.13

Total Revenue (TTM)

O:

$5.92B

PDI:

$2.03B

Gross Profit (TTM)

O:

$3.89B

PDI:

$1.51B

EBITDA (TTM)

O:

$3.93B

PDI:

$2.09B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

O vs. PDI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

O
O Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
O Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
O Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
O Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
O Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
O Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

PDI
PDI Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
PDI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PDI Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
PDI Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
PDI Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
PDI Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

O vs. PDI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Realty Income Corporation (O) and PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund (PDI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


OPDIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.87

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.01

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.29

0.01

+1.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.12

0.03

+3.09

O vs. PDI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current O Sharpe Ratio is 0.88, which is higher than the PDI Sharpe Ratio of 0.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of O and PDI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

O vs. PDI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum O drawdown since its inception was -48.45%, roughly equal to the maximum PDI drawdown of -46.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for O and PDI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OPDIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.45%

-46.47%

-1.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.10%

-10.95%

-0.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.49%

-17.55%

-8.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.48%

-27.19%

-7.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.28%

-46.47%

-1.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.94%

-8.56%

+2.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.20%

-6.22%

-2.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.58%

5.09%

-0.51%

Volatility

O vs. PDI - Volatility Comparison

Realty Income Corporation (O) has a higher volatility of 5.29% compared to PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund (PDI) at 3.31%. This indicates that O's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PDI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OPDIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.29%

3.31%

+1.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.98%

8.27%

+3.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.21%

11.31%

+4.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.92%

15.53%

+3.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.64%

19.04%

+6.60%

Dividends

O vs. PDI - Dividend Comparison

O's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.16%, less than PDI's 16.24% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
O
Realty Income Corporation
5.16%6.19%5.37%5.33%4.68%3.87%4.51%3.69%4.19%4.45%4.18%4.41%
PDI
PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund
16.24%14.94%14.43%14.74%17.84%10.21%10.01%9.45%10.78%8.81%14.79%18.70%

Financials

O vs. PDI - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Realty Income Corporation and PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B20222023202420252026
1.55B
615.21M
(O) Total Revenue
(PDI) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

O vs. PDI - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Realty Income Corporation and PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%202220232024202520260
90.7%
Portfolio components
O - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Realty Income Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 1.55B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

PDI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund reported a gross profit of 558.21M and revenue of 615.21M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 90.7%.

O - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Realty Income Corporation reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 1.55B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

PDI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund reported an operating income of 529.42M and revenue of 615.21M, resulting in an operating margin of 86.1%.

O - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Realty Income Corporation reported a net income of -9.17M and revenue of 1.55B, resulting in a net margin of -0.6%.

PDI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund reported a net income of 457.73M and revenue of 615.21M, resulting in a net margin of 74.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


O and PDI have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

O has higher volatility (5.29%) compared to PDI (3.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, O dropped -48.45% vs PDI's -46.47%.

O currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.88 vs 0.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for O and PDI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer